2017
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2016-3189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Insufficiency in Search of a Bone Disease

Abstract: At a 25(OH)D threshold of ≤30 nmol/L, abnormalities in biochemical features support the notion of a "deficiency" state predisposing to bone disease. However, no deleterious effects were found in participants within an insufficiency threshold of a 25(OH)D level of 30 to 75 nmol/L, which challenges the rationale justifying vitamin D supplementation in these individuals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in line with an earlier animal study which reports similar calcium levels between vitamin D deprived rats as compared to control [33]. A positive association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and serum phosphate is reported in blood samples collected from a pathology laboratory in Melbourne [34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our findings are in line with an earlier animal study which reports similar calcium levels between vitamin D deprived rats as compared to control [33]. A positive association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and serum phosphate is reported in blood samples collected from a pathology laboratory in Melbourne [34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We used cut-off serum 25(OH)D levels of > 20 ng/ml as sufficient, of < 12 ng/ml as deficient, and of 12–20 ng/ml as insufficient to analyze the regression tree values. This cut-off chosen based on previously published data [ 22 , 23 ]. Notably, most subjects in each group were vitamin D deficient, and the proportion of subjects with vitamin D sufficiency did not reach 30%, with exception of the subgroup D in which the majority of individuals (67%) is sufficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a wide difference in the recommended intakes of vitamin D in adults, ranging from 200 to 2000 IU daily [13], and the role of vitamin D in health has been under strong debate even in the UK where the relatively low dosage (400 IU daily) was selected by SACN [14][15][16][17][18][19]. Considering the marked seasonal difference in the association between S-25OHD levels and areal BMD [1], it is possible to interpret that the positive relationship between vitamin D status and areal BMD in many observational studies reflects the situation during summer; physical activity outdoors is a key factor, but its adjustment in the analysis would be difficult because only small number of cycles of mechanical loading is enough to maximally stimulate the skeleton [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%