2007
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-0292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration and Subsequent Risk of Type 2 Diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
197
2
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
11
197
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As it is a major challenge to find strategies for the early detection of individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes, and thereby possibly novel mechanisms for its prevention and early treatment, a few studies have addressed the issue of whether low serum 25(OH)D concentrations can predict the development of type 2 diabetes [7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, some of these reports are limited by, for example, the use of indirect measures or surrogate markers of vitamin D status [11] and type 2 diabetes [9], by a rather small study sample [9] or by an incomplete identification of incident type 2 diabetes [7,8,10]. Thus, further long-term prospective studies involving well-characterised cohorts seem warranted to investigate the predictive value of serum 25(OH)D for type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is a major challenge to find strategies for the early detection of individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes, and thereby possibly novel mechanisms for its prevention and early treatment, a few studies have addressed the issue of whether low serum 25(OH)D concentrations can predict the development of type 2 diabetes [7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, some of these reports are limited by, for example, the use of indirect measures or surrogate markers of vitamin D status [11] and type 2 diabetes [9], by a rather small study sample [9] or by an incomplete identification of incident type 2 diabetes [7,8,10]. Thus, further long-term prospective studies involving well-characterised cohorts seem warranted to investigate the predictive value of serum 25(OH)D for type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Several clinical studies have evaluated the role of low 25OHD3 in the pathogenesis of T2DM, but with controversial results. [10][11][12][13][14][15] Recently, a study has looked into prediabetes and 25OHD3 in a representative population in the United States. This study reported that low serum 25OHD3 levels were associated with prediabetes in that population, with a strong correlation when vitamin D levels were lower than 17 ng/ml.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…800 IU vitamin D was associated with a 33 % risk reduction of type 2 diabetes compared with those with Ca , 600 mg and , 400 IU vitamin D (83) . Baseline serum 25(OH)D levels were inversely associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes in the Min-Finland Health Survey of 4097 eligible participants followed for 17 years (84) . The relative risk (RR) of the highest (mean 70·9 nmol/l) to the lowest (mean 22·4 nmol/l) serum 25(OH)D quartiles was 0·60 (84) .…”
Section: Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline serum 25(OH)D levels were inversely associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes in the Min-Finland Health Survey of 4097 eligible participants followed for 17 years (84) . The relative risk (RR) of the highest (mean 70·9 nmol/l) to the lowest (mean 22·4 nmol/l) serum 25(OH)D quartiles was 0·60 (84) . In a combined analysis of two nested case -control studies with 412 cases and 986 controls in the Finnish Mobile Clinic Health Examination Survey (19 518 men and women aged $ 20 years) and the Mini-Finland Health Survey (8000 individuals aged $ 30 years) followed for 22 and 17 years, respectively, the relative odds of the highest (mean about 75 nmol/l) relative to the lowest (mean about 24 nmol/l) quartiles of baseline serum 25(OH)D was 0·28 for type 2 diabetes in men but not significant in women who had lower serum 25(OH)D (highest quartile mean about 63 nmol/l) (82) .…”
Section: Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%