Advanced Photonics 2016 (IPR, NOMA, Sensors, Networks, SPPCom, SOF) 2016
DOI: 10.1364/sensors.2016.sew3e.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SERS based sandwich immunosensing with plasmonically active plastic optical fiber sensor probes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the AuNP antibody Raman label conjugates not only improve the signal‐to‐noise ratio but also specificity of the biomolecular detection. A sandwich immunoassay with AuNP labels was performed as described in our previous work . Briefly, the amine functionalized probe was saturated with 40 nm gold nanoparticles.…”
Section: Sers Activity Of Plasmonic U‐bent Pof Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the AuNP antibody Raman label conjugates not only improve the signal‐to‐noise ratio but also specificity of the biomolecular detection. A sandwich immunoassay with AuNP labels was performed as described in our previous work . Briefly, the amine functionalized probe was saturated with 40 nm gold nanoparticles.…”
Section: Sers Activity Of Plasmonic U‐bent Pof Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of conventional solid core fibers, plasmonic nanostructures are generated on either the fiber distal end or the fiber core surface to excite them passively or exploit evanescent wave‐based excitation, respectively . In comparison to distal end configuration, the fiber probes with geometric modifications such as D shaped, tapered, or U bent fabricated by inexpensive means have been shown to efficiently excite the plasmonic nanostructures over large modified surface simultaneously by virtue of evanescent waves. Amongst the above fiber modifications, U‐bent probes offer several advantages including (a) ergonomical dip‐type design without risk of breakage at the tip, unlike tapered probes, (b) availability of larger area on fiber for plasmonic nanostructures in comparison to conventional SERS probes, and (c) compatibility with fabrication processes such as nanoparticle chemisorption, microfabrication processes, and recent advances such as nanosphere lithography and nano‐skiving …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%