Smart Biomedical and Physiological Sensor Technology VI 2009
DOI: 10.1117/12.817608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SERS based immuno-microwell arrays for multiplexed detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The labeled approach is by far a more active research area in SERS bacteria detection. Singleplex and multiplex detection of E. coli, S. aureus, Campylobacter, Listeria, and Bacillus anthracis spores coupled with immunomagnetic separation (IMS), microfluidics, and filtration have been reported (19,43,77,104,121,134). Detection has been evaluated in some food matrices, including ground beef, peanut butter, apple juice, and orange juice (19,43,77,121).…”
Section: Detection Methods Based On Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The labeled approach is by far a more active research area in SERS bacteria detection. Singleplex and multiplex detection of E. coli, S. aureus, Campylobacter, Listeria, and Bacillus anthracis spores coupled with immunomagnetic separation (IMS), microfluidics, and filtration have been reported (19,43,77,104,121,134). Detection has been evaluated in some food matrices, including ground beef, peanut butter, apple juice, and orange juice (19,43,77,121).…”
Section: Detection Methods Based On Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Of these sensors, those based on surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) offer several advantages over those employing other spectroscopic techniques, including being capable of multiplexed detection of target species (due to the narrow spectral linewidth), molecular recognition (associated with vibrational spectroscopy), and extremely sensitive analysis. [4][5][6] Despite these advantages, SERS sensors are not as commonly employed for real-world applications as other techniques (e.g., fluorescence) often due to issues with sensitivity and reproducibility. 1,7 One well-cited downfall of SERS sensing is the inherently weak Raman signals that must be enhanced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%