2004
DOI: 10.1346/ccmn.2004.0520107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serpentine-Smectite Interstratified Minerals from Lower Silesia (SW Poland)

Abstract: Interstratif ied serpentine-sm ectite was found in the fine-grained fraction of altered metasomatic contact biotite-schists developed between serpentinite and granite-type rocks (Lower Silesia ophiolite sequence, Poland). Ni-rich serpentine-smectite is R0-interstratified lizardite (0.80)stevensite (0.15)-vermiculite-like (0.05), with a coherent scattering domain (csd) of 5 layers (mean value). The Mg-rich variety of serpentine-smectite is R1 lizardite (0.80)-stevensite (0.20) with a csd size of 7 layers (mean … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interstratified serpentine‐smectite and chlorite‐smectite each typically display sharp 7 Å features not observed in our materials [ Moore and Reynolds , ; Sakharov et al ., ]. However, unambiguous observation of those 7 Å features requires serpentine/chlorite coherent scattering domains of five layers or more [ Sakharov et al ., ]. Thus, the Fe‐Mg excess in samples G and H can be explained by interstratified chlorite or serpentine only if those domains are very small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interstratified serpentine‐smectite and chlorite‐smectite each typically display sharp 7 Å features not observed in our materials [ Moore and Reynolds , ; Sakharov et al ., ]. However, unambiguous observation of those 7 Å features requires serpentine/chlorite coherent scattering domains of five layers or more [ Sakharov et al ., ]. Thus, the Fe‐Mg excess in samples G and H can be explained by interstratified chlorite or serpentine only if those domains are very small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both serpentine and chlorite contain additional octahedral layers in their structure relative to smectite and are thus Fe and Mg enriched. Interstratified serpentine‐smectite and chlorite‐smectite each typically display sharp 7 Å features not observed in our materials [ Moore and Reynolds , ; Sakharov et al ., ]. However, unambiguous observation of those 7 Å features requires serpentine/chlorite coherent scattering domains of five layers or more [ Sakharov et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall agreement, both visually (Figure 5) and quantitatively with R values systematically being <13%, demonstrates the ability of the multi‐specimen approach to provide a good quality fit to experimental data obtained on polyphasic soil samples: this is consistent with previous studies in other geological settings (Drits et al ., 1997a, 2002a,b, 2004, 2007; Sakharov et al ., 1999a,b, 2004; Lindgreen et al ., 2000, 2002; Claret et al ., 2004; McCarty et al ., 2004, 2008; Inoue et al ., 2005; Aplin et al ., 2006; Lanson et al ., 2009). This approach can thus be used to determine accurate structural characteristics for the phases present in a given sample, as well as their relative proportions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, the multi‐specimen method has been widely used to characterize clay mineralogy and its evolution in diagenetic and hydrothermal series (Drits et al ., 1997a, 2002a,b, 2004, 2007; Sakharov et al ., 1999a,b, 2004; Lindgreen et al ., 2000, 2002; Claret et al ., 2004; McCarty et al ., 2004, 2008; Inoue et al ., 2005; Aplin et al ., 2006; Lanson et al ., 2009). Compared with diagenetic and hydrothermal clay pargeneses, soil clay species are poorly crystallized and numerous randomly interstratified mixed layers could coexist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X‐ray diffraction has the ability to definitively quantify and identify clay mineral composition, which helps describe soils in relation to plant and soil properties, such as plant cover, organic matter, and agricultural practices (Pernes‐Debuyser et al, 2003; Fontaine et al, 2007). X‐ray diffraction has classically used peak positions in clay mineralogy studies (Hubert et al, 2012), but more recently peak positions and peak shapes have been used in full profile advanced computer models (Sakharov et al, 2004).…”
Section: Contemporary Analytical Approaches In Soil Mineralogymentioning
confidence: 99%