Seroprevalence of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 – a serial prospective cross-sectional nationwide study of residual samples, Belgium, March to October 2020
Abstract:Background
To control epidemic waves, it is important to know the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 and its evolution over time in relation to the control measures taken.
Aim
To assess the evolving SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and seroincidence related to the first national lockdown in Belgium, we performed a nationwide seroprevalence study, stratified by age, sex and region using 3,000–4,000 residual samples during seven periods bet… Show more
“…Incomplete case-finding prior to and over the study period however remains a possible bias for our VE-estimates. Despite high capacity and free RT-PCR-tests, Belgian seroprevalence studies report underdiagnosis of SARS-CoV-2-infections [37] .…”
“…Incomplete case-finding prior to and over the study period however remains a possible bias for our VE-estimates. Despite high capacity and free RT-PCR-tests, Belgian seroprevalence studies report underdiagnosis of SARS-CoV-2-infections [37] .…”
“…Results from the SalivaHIS study, conducted when the vaccination campaign in Belgium was running at full speed (between March and August 2021), found that the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among the general population in Belgium increased significantly from 25.2% in the first period (March 2021, week 13–14) to 78.1% in the last period (July 2021, week 26–27). A previous study, conducted after the first national lockdown in Belgium, showed a seroprevalence of 4.2% in October 2020 [ 22 ]. Furthermore, just before the launch of the vaccination campaign in January 2021, seroprevalence studies among Belgian blood donors [ 12 ] and primary health care workers [ 12 ] described a seroprevalence of 18.7% and 15.1%, respectively.…”
The prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and potential determinants were assessed in a random sample representative of the Belgian adult population. In total, 14,201 individuals (≥18 years) were invited by mail to provide saliva via an Oracol® swab. Survey weights were applied, and potential determinants were estimated using multivariable logistic regressions. Between March and August 2021, 2767 individuals participated in the first data collection. During this period, which coincided with the onset of the vaccination campaign, the seroprevalence in the population increased from 25.2% in March/April to 78.1% in July. Among the vaccinated there was an increase from 74,2% to 98.8%; among the unvaccinated, the seroprevalence remained stable (around 17%). Among the vaccinated, factors significantly associated with the presence of antibodies were: having at least one chronic disease (ORa 0.22 (95% CI 0.08–0.62)), having received an mRNA-type vaccine (ORa 5.38 (95% CI 1.72–16.80)), and having received an influenza vaccine in 2020–2021 (ORa 3.79 (95% CI 1.30–11.07)). Among the unvaccinated, having a non-O blood type (ORa 2.00 (95% CI 1.09–3.67)) and having one or more positive COVID-19 tests (ORa 11.04 (95% CI 4.69–26.02)) were significantly associated. This study provides a better understanding of vaccine- and/or natural-induced presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and factors that are associated with this presence.
“…The study demonstrated an average seroprevalence of 17.1% in residents and staff from NH across the Flemish region in the period mid-October to mid-November. This is higher than the seroprevalence of 9.2% in blood donors in the general Belgian population at the end of October 2020 [4,5], increasing to 13.6% by November, 11th [4].…”
Section: The Seroprevalence In Nh In Flanders In Fall 2020 Was Higher...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the reports on seroprevalence results, based on samples before 2021 (before the start of the vaccination campaign), are limited. The available results [4,5], revealed that, the percentage of blood donors (as a proxy for the general Belgian population) with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies was increasing from 5.0% (end of April 2020) up to 9.2% by the end of October 2020. For hospital staff [4,6,7], the seroprevalence was varying between 7.7% (end of April 2020) and 10.8% (end of October 2020).…”
Seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG antibodies, using dried blood spots, was determined in October-November 2020, among residents and staff randomly selected from 20 nursing homes (NH) geographically distributed in Flanders, Belgium. Sociodemographic and medical data [including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms and results of RT-PCR tests] were retrieved using questionnaires. The overall seroprevalence was 17.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14.9-19.5], with 18.9% (95% CI 15.9-22.2) of the residents and 14.9% (95% CI 11.9-18.4) of the staff having antibodies, which was higher than the seroprevalence in blood donors. The seroprevalence in the 20 NH varied between 0.0% and 45.0%. Fourteen per cent of the staff with antibodies, reported no typical COVID-19 symptoms, while in residents, 51.0% of those with antibodies had no symptoms. The generalised mixed effect model showed a positive association between COVID-19 symptoms and positive serology, but this relation was weaker in residents compared to staff. This study shows that NH are more affected by SARS-CoV-2 than the general population. The large variation between NH, suggests that some risk factors for the spread among residents and staff may be related to the NH. Further, the results suggest that infected people, without the typical COVID-19 symptoms, might play a role in outbreaks.
8Heidi Janssens et al.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.