Serological survey on bovine parainfluenza type 3 in Shahrekord district (Iran)

Kojouri, Gholam Ali; Hemmatzadeh, Farhid; Taghadosi, Camellia

doi:10.1007/s00580-010-0958-9

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The PIV3 and BRSV was not widely reported in India earlier except few solitary reports from Orissa and sans from Punjab. Ratio of higher to low seroprevalence of these viral agents with the present study were reported globally as that reported in bovine from Iran which was 51.1%, 72% and 84.4% against BRSV, PIV3 and IBR respectively (Shirvani et al, 2012) and by Kojouri et al, in 2011 as 30% for PIV3 serum antibodies. In Saudi Arabia 17.4% for IBR, 69.1% for PIV3 and 75.6% for BRSV seroprevalence was reported in 2013 (Yousef et al, 2013).…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 80%

Detection of Multiple Antibodies and Risk Factor Association of Common Respiratory Viruses in the State of Punjab, India

Banga¹,

Singh²,

Brar³

2017

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 80%

Detection of Multiple Antibodies and Risk Factor Association of Common Respiratory Viruses in the State of Punjab, India

Banga¹,

Singh²,

Brar³

2017

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Serological tests used to detect antibodies included the following: a) PPR cELISA kit (Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright laboratory, UK), b) pestivirus blocking ELISA kit (BVDV) and (BDV) (Svanovir® BVDV p80-Ab, Boehringer Svanova Ingelheim, Uppsala, Sweden), c) Bluetongue competitive ELISA (ID VET, Montpellier, France) and d) Bovine Herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1) ELISA kit(Svanovir® IBR-Ab, Boehringer Svanova Ingelheim, Uppsala, Sweden) and e) virus neutralization test (VNT) for parainfluenza type 3 [60]. Pestivirus antigen detection kit, (Moredun Scientific Limited, Edinburgh, UK) was also used for detection of pestivirus antigens in buffy coat cells.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Each of these serum samples were previously evaluated in different assays. For virus neutralization test, each serum sample was tested in two independent assay runs and serum samples with a titre of 1/64 or higher were considered positive [63]. All of the control samples were evaluated in each assay run and showed to be suitable for their intended purposes and served to monitor the assays consistency.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although PI3V can cause primary respiratory disease in cattle, it usually leads to the development of secondary bacterial infections in the respiratory tract of large ruminants [59]. Both serological and PCR studies showed a high prevalence of these infections in livestock in Iran [60]. The extent of these infections in wild ruminants is not well documented [1, 56].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Molecular and Serological Survey of Selected Viruses in Free-Ranging Wild Ruminants in Iran

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A molecular and serological survey of selected viruses in free-ranging wild ruminants was conducted in 13 different districts in Iran. Samples were collected from 64 small wild ruminants belonging to four different species including 25 Mouflon (Ovis orientalis), 22 wild goat (Capra aegagrus), nine Indian gazelle (Gazella bennettii) and eight Goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) during the national survey for wildlife diseases in Iran. Serum samples were evaluated using serologic antibody tests for Peste de petits ruminants virus (PPRV), Pestiviruses [Border Disease virus (BVD) and Bovine Viral Diarrhoea virus (BVDV)], Bluetongue virus (BTV), Bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BHV-1), and Parainfluenza type 3 (PI3). Sera were also ELISA tested for Pestivirus antigen. Tissue samples including spleen, liver, lung, tonsils, mesenteric and mediastinal lymph nodes and white blood cells (WBCs) were tested using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for PPRV, Foot and Mouth Disease virus (FMDV), Pestivirus, BTV, Ovine herpesvirus type 2 (OvHV-2) and BHV-1. Serologic tests were positive for antibodies against PPRV (17%), Pestiviruses (2%) and BTV (2%). No antibodies were detected for BHV-1 or PI3, and no Pestivirus antigen was detected. PCR results were positive for PPRV (7.8%), FMDV (11%), BTV (3%), OvHV-2 (31%) and BHV-1 (1.5%). None of the samples were positive for Pestiviruses.

show abstract

“…of bovine parainfluenza-3 virus using antibody detection method before and after outlier removal. * outliers:[15,42,44,45].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Bovine Parainfluenza-3 Virus Detection Methods and Prevalence in Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Werid,

Van,

Miller

et al. 2024

Animals

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bovine parainfluenza-3 virus (BPI3V) is an important respiratory pathogen in cattle, contributing to syndromes in the bovine respiratory disease complex (BRDC). Despite its significance, the understanding of its prevalence remains fragmented, especially within the larger framework of BRDC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the global prevalence of BPI3V in cattle using varied detection methods and to highlight associated risk factors. Of 2187 initially retrieved articles, 71 were selected for analysis, covering 32 countries. Depending on the detection method employed, the meta-analysis revealed significant variations in BPI3V prevalence. In the general cattle population, the highest prevalence was observed using the antibody detection method, with a proportion of 0.64. In contrast, in cattle with BRDC, a prevalence of 0.75 was observed. For the antigen detection method, a prevalence of 0.15 was observed, exclusively in cattle with BRDC. In nucleic acid detection, a prevalence of 0.05 or 0.10 was observed in the general and BRDC cattle populations, respectively. In virus isolation methods, a prevalence of 0.05 or 0.04 was observed in the general and BRDC cattle populations, respectively. These findings highlight the differences in the detection ability of different methods in identifying BPI3V. Other factors, such as country, study year, coinfections, farm size, the presence of respiratory signs, sex, and body weight, may also affect the prevalence. Most studies were anchored within broader BRDC investigations or aimed at detecting other diseases, indicating a potential under-representation of focused BPI3V research. BPI3V plays an important role in BRDC, with its prevalence varying significantly based on the detection methodology. To further understand its unique role within BRDC and pave the way for targeted interventions, there is an evident need for independent, dedicated research on BPI3V.

show abstract

Serological survey on bovine parainfluenza type 3 in Shahrekord district (Iran)

Cited by 4 publications

References 10 publications

Detection of Multiple Antibodies and Risk Factor Association of Common Respiratory Viruses in the State of Punjab, India

Detection of Multiple Antibodies and Risk Factor Association of Common Respiratory Viruses in the State of Punjab, India

Molecular and Serological Survey of Selected Viruses in Free-Ranging Wild Ruminants in Iran

Bovine Parainfluenza-3 Virus Detection Methods and Prevalence in Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About