1999
DOI: 10.1053/tvjl.1998.0276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological Evidence of Spirochaetal Infections Associated with Digital Dermatitis in Dairy Cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
41
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…41,2003 CHARACTERIZATION OF DIGITAL DERMATITIS SPIROCHETES 2527 moral and cellular responses to bovine T. phagedenis-like spirochetes. This supported previous studies that demonstrated humoral responses to T. phagedenis-like and also T. denticolalike spirochetes in cattle with PDD lesions (14,43). Interestingly, in these previous studies, a serum immunoglobulin G response was demonstrated to strain 2-1498 and immunoblotting showed that the predominant antigens were proteins of 34, 41, and 55 kDa, although some cows also produced antibody to LPS-like material (14,43).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…41,2003 CHARACTERIZATION OF DIGITAL DERMATITIS SPIROCHETES 2527 moral and cellular responses to bovine T. phagedenis-like spirochetes. This supported previous studies that demonstrated humoral responses to T. phagedenis-like and also T. denticolalike spirochetes in cattle with PDD lesions (14,43). Interestingly, in these previous studies, a serum immunoglobulin G response was demonstrated to strain 2-1498 and immunoblotting showed that the predominant antigens were proteins of 34, 41, and 55 kDa, although some cows also produced antibody to LPS-like material (14,43).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Despite much indirect evidence linking spirochetes with the etiology of PDD (2,11,14,28,29,44), the pathogenic capability of these organisms still remains to be established. A significant hindrance to progress is the difficulty many researchers have experienced in isolating spirochetes from PDD lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treponema spp., which bear similar antigenic characteristics as B. burgdorferi (Blowey et al 1994) were identified as possible pathogens in cases of digital dermatitis (Walker et al 1995). Demirkan et al (1999) found significant cross-reacting epitopes shared by B. burgdorferi and Treponema spp. in cattle with digital dermatitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the high number of invasive spirochetes observed suggests an active contribution of this group to DD pathogenesis (8,9,12,16,24,35). This hypothesis is further substantiated by the fact that serum samples from cattle infected with DD contain elevated levels of antibody to Treponema antigens (13,25,36). Also, it has been demonstrated that four Treponema strains previously isolated from DD-infected cows were able to induce abscess formation in mice (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The disease was first described to occur in Italy in 1974 (7) and has since been found in many parts of the world, where it now constitutes a significant welfare and production problem (23,27). A bacterial etiology of DD is supported by the observation that cattle infected with DD respond to antibiotic treatment and that virus isolation from affected tissues has been unsuccessful (13). The disease appears to be polymicrobial; a variety of bacteria has been cultivated from DD lesions (19,32), and although spirochetes seem to be the predominating group, various rods and cocci can also be recognized in microscopic sections of DD specimens (10,39).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%