2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serologic response to a third dose of an mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in lung transplant recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly in SOT recipients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, anti-RBD IgG responses were comparable to that in controls. In line with our finding, previous studies showed that SARS-CoV-2 infection before or after vaccination boosts the humoral immune response and elicits broader immunity than vaccination alone (13,29,30,49). In our study, only 15% of SOT recipients received the vaccine doses, and the proportions of participants with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were comparable between SOT recipients and controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Importantly in SOT recipients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, anti-RBD IgG responses were comparable to that in controls. In line with our finding, previous studies showed that SARS-CoV-2 infection before or after vaccination boosts the humoral immune response and elicits broader immunity than vaccination alone (13,29,30,49). In our study, only 15% of SOT recipients received the vaccine doses, and the proportions of participants with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were comparable between SOT recipients and controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“… 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 Previous studies showed that around half of solid organ recipients who were non-responders to the second dose seroconverted after a third mRNA vaccine dose, given as booster. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 However, only few studies have determined the effectiveness of a third vaccine dose in LTR, 16 , 17 and markers predictive of vaccine response are still lacking. In order to quantify the impact of immunosuppression on vaccine response and hopefully to predict response or nonresponse, one should be able to quantify the level of immunosuppression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in a small study population, Havlin et al showed impaired humoral responses to the third dose (13%), despite detectable specific T cells responses [ 24 ]. In the study published by Hoffman et al, a humoral response after the third dose was detected in 62% LuTRs [ 25 ]. In the present study, a humoral response was detected in 22 of 24 (92%) LuTRs, with significantly higher antibody titers compared to those after the second dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%