2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-017-1382-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seroepidemiological survey on Leptospira spp. infection in wild and domestic mammals in two distinct areas of the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil

Abstract: Leptospirosis is a bacterial zoonotic disease that causes severe reproductive problems in livestock and generates economic losses for farmers. This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence of anti-Leptospira antibodies in small mammals, both wild and domestic, in two distinct areas of the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil: the National Park of Serra das Confusões (NPSC), state of Piauí, a preserved area; and rural areas in the municipalities of Petrolina and Lagoa Grande, state of Pernambuco, non-pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies from different parts of the world have shown urinary shedding and/or seropositivity in cats, suggesting that cats may have a role as a reservoir or accidental host [44][45][46][47][48]. However, in our study, all tested cats were negative for the presence of leptospiral antibodies and leptospiruria.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Earlier studies from different parts of the world have shown urinary shedding and/or seropositivity in cats, suggesting that cats may have a role as a reservoir or accidental host [44][45][46][47][48]. However, in our study, all tested cats were negative for the presence of leptospiral antibodies and leptospiruria.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Inúmeros trabalhos avaliaram a ocorrência de animais sororreagentes a diversos sorovares de Leptospira sp. em outras regiões do Brasil, cujos resultados são variáveis, denotando que determinadas características epidemiológicas podem interferir numa maior ou menor circulação do agente (Aguiar et al, 2007;Azevedo et al, 2011;Jorge et al, 2011;Santos et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…In other regions of the country wild animals and dogs also showed higher occurrence than in the present study, such as dogs studied in the state of Paraíba [4] with 21.4% (61/285) seropositivity, Rio Grande do Norte with 6.8% (25/365) [9], Paraná with 11% per dog-trimester [27], and Pará with 17.15% (47/274) [31]. In two semi-arid regions of Brazil the seropositivity was 5.6% (10/180) in dog and 3.9% (6/152) in wild mammals [34]. Moreover wild canids and wild rats in the municipality of Minas Gerais presented 35% (14/40) and 30.3% (13/43) seropositivity, respectively [13,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%