2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.intmar.2018.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seriously Engaged Consumers: Navigating Between Work and Play in Online Brand Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The marketplace is embedded in consumption paradoxes, such as individualism/tribalism and work/play (de Almeida et al, 2018;Skandalis et al, 2016). We believe that CCT can facilitate the un- competition (at a micro-level), politics or the economy (at a macrolevel) (Waqas et al, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The marketplace is embedded in consumption paradoxes, such as individualism/tribalism and work/play (de Almeida et al, 2018;Skandalis et al, 2016). We believe that CCT can facilitate the un- competition (at a micro-level), politics or the economy (at a macrolevel) (Waqas et al, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Consumer interactions are also expected to generate engagement, particularly between members and a brand (e.g., de Almeida et al., 2018; Samala & Katkam, 2019). Engagement varies in context and intensity (de Almeida et al., 2018). Notwithstanding, brand transgressions can undermine co‐creative and engagement efforts, which can be solved through coping strategies (Weijo et al., 2019).…”
Section: Review Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature demonstrated positive correlations between community members' pursuit of functional/social incentives and ensuing surges in community participation (Bruhn et al, 2014; de Almeida et al, 2018; Mathwick et al, 2008; Nambisan & Baron, 2009, 2010; Pansari & Kumar, 2016). Beyond being a revolutionary communicative medium, social media serves as channel content that modern generations access for information.…”
Section: Theoretical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on these findings, Cheng et al (2018) argued that people build relationships with OBCs because of their need to acquire connections with new people. However, a burgeoning stream of scholars have called for further work on OBCs and customer loyalty because current studies are insufficient in several notable aspects (e.g., Baldus et al, 2015; de Almeida et al, 2018; He et al, 2017; Swaminathan et al, 2020). First, existing studies collectively assume that OBCs and customer loyalty are predominantly linear within a customer segment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While scholars show an increasing interest in the historical development of the Internet as socio-technical phenomenon, qualitative studies of online communities as online sociality remain dominated by ahistorical portrayals (Adams & Smith, 2008; Wilson & Peterson, 2002). With a few exceptions (de Almeida et al, 2018; Pearce, 2009), the study of the long-term development of online communities has largely been left to quantitative researchers. These studies have sought to measure the sustainability or putative “success” of online communities based on community activity (Malinen, 2015; Preece, 2001), identified variables that determine users’ willingness to contribute to online communities (Li, 2011), and discussed encouraging user engagement as a challenge for community providers (Kamboj & Rahman, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%