1989
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.298.6665.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serious eye injuries due to war games.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their patient's goggles were driven into the globe from the force of impact of the paintball. Many similar reports have been published since then that described goggle failure 6,11,12,14 and paint entering around the goggles 7 and through ventilation holes. 9,13 In their 1989 report, Welsh et al 17 recommended a simple eye glass style safety lens with side pieces (Fig 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their patient's goggles were driven into the globe from the force of impact of the paintball. Many similar reports have been published since then that described goggle failure 6,11,12,14 and paint entering around the goggles 7 and through ventilation holes. 9,13 In their 1989 report, Welsh et al 17 recommended a simple eye glass style safety lens with side pieces (Fig 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Many of the participants started the game with eye protection but removed them because of fogging, discomfort, or paint on the lens or had the goggles accidentally dislodged while running. 2,3,5,6,12,14,16,17,19 In 1987, Martin and Magolan 4 reported the first case of eye injury despite the use of goggles. Their patient's goggles were driven into the globe from the force of impact of the paintball.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, cases have been reported where the EPD was worn by the participant and an eye injury still occurred. In 1 case, 16 the paintball entered under a mask; in another, 17 the paintball displaced the goggles; and in 3 cases, 18,19 the goggles themselves were projected into the eye. In our series, 3 of the ocular injuries (in patients 11, 13, and 26) occurred while the EPD was being worn.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%