2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serial structural and functional assessments of rotator cuff repairs: do they differ at 6 and 19 months postoperatively?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
40
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At 6 months postoperatively, some tendon maturation may still be taking place and strength may not be fully recovered. 27 Mechanical pullout tests of repairs at 6 months, for instance, have shown a failure strength that represents only 81% of an intact tendon. 20 Moreover, only 25 of the 100 points in the Constant score are allocated to strength, 9 and lack of strength is the main subjective complaint at midterm follow-up after rotator cuff repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At 6 months postoperatively, some tendon maturation may still be taking place and strength may not be fully recovered. 27 Mechanical pullout tests of repairs at 6 months, for instance, have shown a failure strength that represents only 81% of an intact tendon. 20 Moreover, only 25 of the 100 points in the Constant score are allocated to strength, 9 and lack of strength is the main subjective complaint at midterm follow-up after rotator cuff repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional time thus should be encouraged in many patients who have an unsatisfactory result at 6 months. 27 On the other hand, for those patients who had pain and lacked healing at 6 months, pain persisted. Similar to the findings of Namdari et al, 37 only about half of these patients in our study obtained a satisfactory result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings support previous studies that showed rotator cuffs either regain their integrity or retear within 6 months after repair. 20 Given a similar operative technique and uniform rehabilitation protocol, the higher retear rates of the revision group could be explained by the fact that the repairs were done in a degenerated and already weakened tendon from previous repair. Biberthaler et al 2 showed that in the regions of degenerated rotator cuff, there was a significantly lower microcirculation-less capillary density and diameter compared with the unaffected rotator cuff regions in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients underwent a follow-up MRI evaluation at a postoperative 6 months to determine rotator cuff integrity and healing status of the repaired tendon. 22 We classified rotator cuff repair status as per the Sugaya classification. 42 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%