Abstract:Although many leaching methods have been used for various purposes by research groups, industries, and regulators, there is still a need for a simple but comprehensive approach to leaching coal utilization by-products and other granular materials in order to estimate potential release of heavy metals when these materials are exposed to natural fluids. A serial batch characterization method has been developed at the National Energy Technology Laboratory that can be completed in 2-3 days to serve as a screening … Show more
“…In accordance with Hesbach et al [9], each pH step cannot be considered as an individual event. Leachate composition after a step will depend on both this pH environment and on interactions solid-leaching solution occurred during the previous leaching steps.…”
Section: Fly Ash Samples (F)mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The values are reported in Table 2. Leaching tests were performed using sequential batch tests based on the approach used by Hesbach et al [9]. The individual leaching step volumes and their run times were indicated in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure provides a determination of the metals released under varying pH conditions starting from a solution with pH value comparable to that of the fly ash samples (alkaline pH). The first step was to determine the pH of fly ash and zeolitic fly ash samples [9]. The samples were then leached at progressively more acidic pH values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although coal fly ash is partly used in concrete and cement manufacturing, more than half percent of the production is disposed of in landfills. A method to evaluate the elemental mobility in coal fly ash is to perform leaching tests using different leachant solutions [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The crucial factors in element solubility are the leaching time, the solubility kinetics, the liquid/ solid ratio (L/S) and the influence of the leachant pH.…”
“…In accordance with Hesbach et al [9], each pH step cannot be considered as an individual event. Leachate composition after a step will depend on both this pH environment and on interactions solid-leaching solution occurred during the previous leaching steps.…”
Section: Fly Ash Samples (F)mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The values are reported in Table 2. Leaching tests were performed using sequential batch tests based on the approach used by Hesbach et al [9]. The individual leaching step volumes and their run times were indicated in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure provides a determination of the metals released under varying pH conditions starting from a solution with pH value comparable to that of the fly ash samples (alkaline pH). The first step was to determine the pH of fly ash and zeolitic fly ash samples [9]. The samples were then leached at progressively more acidic pH values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although coal fly ash is partly used in concrete and cement manufacturing, more than half percent of the production is disposed of in landfills. A method to evaluate the elemental mobility in coal fly ash is to perform leaching tests using different leachant solutions [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The crucial factors in element solubility are the leaching time, the solubility kinetics, the liquid/ solid ratio (L/S) and the influence of the leachant pH.…”
“…There are two major types of leaching tests concerning their set up: Column tests, which better simulate field conditions, and batch tests, which provide evidence for the maximum potential mobility of an element. Batch tests are more widely applied due to their relatively rapid and reliable results but can easily misinterpreted if only absolute values are to be considered (Siavalas et al, 2007;Baba et al, 2008;Hesbach et al, 2009). The lignite mining activities in Turkey appear to have serious repercussions in underground waters.…”
Speciation of volatile metals Cd, Pb, and Tl in fly ashes (FAs) produced from burning of hard coal in stocker-fired boilers (SFBs) was studied. Two grain fractions of fly ash collected in a multicyclone and battery cyclone of the systems of dust separation from three SFB units operating in various urban heating plants were analyzed. The characteristic feature of speciation of the three metals was a large share of labile fractions: Cd (av. 46.1 %), Pb (av. 39.8 %), and Tl (av. 21.6 %). The fraction which most clearly reflected the different chemical properties of the investigated metals was the oxidizable fraction: F(4)-Cd-0 %, F(4)-Pb-av. 10.0 %, and F(4)-Tl-av. 30.2 %. The importance of condensation of the volatile metal species on FA particles for shaping speciation of these metals was characterized using the normalized enrichment factor (NEF): Pb (2.3 ± 0.8) > Tl (1.8 ± 0.9) ≈ Cd (1.7 ± 0.6). Speciation of heavy metals may also be important economically, because the level of mobility coefficients (K = 0.46, K = 0.40, and K = 0.22) in the case of fly ashes considerably enriched with toxic metals (Cd 4.8 ± 3.4 mg/kg, Pb 293 ± 210 mg/kg, and Tl 6.3 ± 4.5 mg/kg) may limit their utilization range.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.