2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11390-020-0135-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serendipity in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the idea of serendipity has been proposed to solve the filter-bubble problem by offering novel, diverse and high-satisfaction recommendations. (Ziarani and Ravanmehr 2021) gave general explanations about why serendipity items could work for tackling the filter-bubble situations. (Yang et al 2018) proposed a matrix factorization-based model for enhancing serendipity for superior recommendations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, the idea of serendipity has been proposed to solve the filter-bubble problem by offering novel, diverse and high-satisfaction recommendations. (Ziarani and Ravanmehr 2021) gave general explanations about why serendipity items could work for tackling the filter-bubble situations. (Yang et al 2018) proposed a matrix factorization-based model for enhancing serendipity for superior recommendations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the filter-bubble problem, most researchers so far have focused on exploiting auxiliary information such as users' attributes (Bi et al 2020), user's social relations (Fu et al 2021), and item's description text (Chae et al 2020) or reviews (Wang, Ounis, and Macdonald 2021). Along with this line, serendipity-oriented recommender system are proposed to make unexpected but valuable items to users (Yang et al 2018;Ziarani and Ravanmehr 2021). However, their models are effective and useful only when these auxiliary information are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, SLR is more comprehensive, has lower risk of bias, has more formal and systematic protocols, but is relatively slower compared to narrative and traditional literature reviews. Recently, several studies used this type of review in the field of recommender systems [15][16][17].…”
Section: Survey Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feedback loop effect is studied in real and model systems as an undesirable phenomenon related to reliable and ethical AI. Some of the consequences of the effect are induced shift in users interests [6], loss of novelty and diversity in recommendations [14], presence of "echo chambers" and "filter bubbles" [4,5], induced concept drift in housing prices prediction [8]. Nevertheless, a full description of the feedback loop effect and its existence conditions is still lacking for many cases [10,1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%