2018
DOI: 10.3329/jdmc.v26i2.38825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sera-epidemiology of Dengue Virus Infection in Clinically Suspected Patients Attended in Dhaka Medical College Hospital During January to December 2016

Abstract: Introduction: Dengue is now established as one of the most important Arboviral infection in tropical countries. As the epidemic continues worldwide, this Aedes mosquito-transmitted pathogen is considered a major re-emerging tropical disease and significant public health concern. The study was conducted to determine the sero-epidemiology and clinical picture of dengue virus infection among the clinically suspected patients attended in Dhaka Medical College Hospital during January to December 2016.Materials and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study from a non-endemic zone of Bangladesh during the 2019 outbreak also reveals similar findings [32]. Our comparison of studies conducted in DMCH in 2008 [20], 2016 [21], 2018 [22], and the current study also reveals a decreasing proportion of bleeding manifestations (e.g., melena). Melena was the most common form of bleeding followed by gum bleeding in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study from a non-endemic zone of Bangladesh during the 2019 outbreak also reveals similar findings [32]. Our comparison of studies conducted in DMCH in 2008 [20], 2016 [21], 2018 [22], and the current study also reveals a decreasing proportion of bleeding manifestations (e.g., melena). Melena was the most common form of bleeding followed by gum bleeding in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Finally, three original articles that fulfilled the criteria (i.e. Outbreak report of 2008 by Arif et al [13], 2016 by Pervin et al [20]; 2018 by Sultana et al [21]) were used for data extraction and comparison with the latest outbreak of 2019. The collective variables data from each of the above-mentioned reports were compared, specifically for differences in clinical manifestations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the majority (62%) of the confirmed case belonged to the 16–30 age group, with a mean age of 29 years in the 2002 outbreak [ 21 ]. Older adolescents and young adults also comprised the majority of the cases in 2016 (21–40; 55%), 2018 (15–29; 65%), and 2019 (21–40; 50%) outbreaks [ 28 30 ]. A similar result was reported in Sri Lanka in 2018 [ 31 ] and Ethiopia in 2017 [ 32 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%