2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential saccharification of corn fiber and ethanol production by the brown rot fungus Gloeophyllum trabeum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is evident that both starch and hemi/cellulose fractions contributed significantly to enzyme induction and to saccharification and fermentation of corn fiber to ethanol. Similar results were also observed by Shrestha et al (5 ) and Rasmussen et al (6 ) for white-and brown-rot saccharification studies, respectively. There were no statistical differences between R-amylase and glucoamylase activities for all three fungal cultures ( Table 2, section b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, it is evident that both starch and hemi/cellulose fractions contributed significantly to enzyme induction and to saccharification and fermentation of corn fiber to ethanol. Similar results were also observed by Shrestha et al (5 ) and Rasmussen et al (6 ) for white-and brown-rot saccharification studies, respectively. There were no statistical differences between R-amylase and glucoamylase activities for all three fungal cultures ( Table 2, section b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Take crops straw for example, it is not only valuable in improvement of soil properties and crop production (Shi et al, 2010;Tejada et al, 2008;Kasteel et al, 2007;Liu et al, 2006;Kumar and Goh, 2000), composted fertilizer (Lim et al, 2012), forage processing, biofuel production (Tian et al, 2013;Sun et al, 2010;Rasmussen et al, 2010;Han et al, 2009), and industrial utilization (Suzuki et al, 2007), but also in the research potential and utilizing prospects in the field of agricultural pests management (Cao et al, 2010;Han et al, 2010;Ma et al, 2013), environmental pollution abatement (Liu et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2008;Chen and Yuan, 2011;Jones et al, 2011), etc. (Duan et al, 2012Woolf et al, 2010).…”
Section: Agriculture Waste (Residue) Resources and Environmental Sustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two ml of fungal biomass [1.5% (w/v) P. chrysosporium and 1.0% (w/v) G. trabeum] in mineral salt solution was then added. The bottles were rolled on their sides and the marbles assisted in uniformly dispersing and coating the corn stover and fungi mixture along the inner surface [38,44]. Solid substrate fermentation was then performed for 4 days at 37 o C in a humidified incubator for in situ production of cellulases and hemicellulases prior to the addition of the ethanolic microorganism.…”
Section: Solid Substrate Fermentation For Enzyme Inductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the SSF process in previous works, ours does not use pretreated corn stover samples [13,19,25,42] or the addition of expensive commercial enzymes [12,26,53]. Instead, cellulases and hemicellulases are produced by G. trabeum and P. chrysosporium in situ upon corn stover enzyme induction performed via solid substrate fermentation in a pH range of 4.5-4.8 at 37 o C for 4 days, conditions that are suitable not only for the growth of the fungi but also for production of cellulolytic enzymes [38,43,44]. As seen in Table 2, our assay using the NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer indicated that protein was produced during the induction stage, and production was higher in the stover and P. chrysosporium combination compared with the stover and G. trabeum combination, at 14.06 and 11.61 mg/ml, respectively.…”
Section: Enzyme Induction On Untreated Corn Stovermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation