2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.83.062332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential measurement-based quantum computing with memories

Abstract: We introduce a general scheme for sequential one-way quantum computation where static systems with long-living quantum coherence (memories) interact with moving systems that may possess very short coherence times. Both the generation of the cluster state needed for the computation and its consumption by measurements are carried out simultaneously. As a consequence, effective clusters of one spatial dimension fewer than in the standard approach are sufficient for computation. In particular, universal computatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(60 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with previously published work related to MBQC, the QFPGA architecture combines small blocks of cluster states by using global buses, so as to make the overall structure more scalable, flexible, and also clear. On the other hand, we not only take advantage of the concept of quantum memory to drive the sequential MBQC, but we also integrate small modules to simplify the operation which is complex in the original paper [28]. Hence our model is more effective but at a cost of some level of decoherence error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with previously published work related to MBQC, the QFPGA architecture combines small blocks of cluster states by using global buses, so as to make the overall structure more scalable, flexible, and also clear. On the other hand, we not only take advantage of the concept of quantum memory to drive the sequential MBQC, but we also integrate small modules to simplify the operation which is complex in the original paper [28]. Hence our model is more effective but at a cost of some level of decoherence error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proposed architecture consists of two parts: The first part is an array of static, long-lived quantum memories that can interact with moving, short-lived quantum registers-flying qubits-via a fixed interaction [28]. We call this part "quantum routing channels" (QRCs), which are used as quantum routing resources and to realize diagonal unitary operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the same name will be used for the more general model developed here. Furthermore, we note that the basic gate methods used in our general QV ADQC model are closely related to those proposed by Roncaglia et al [41], although Ref. [41] only explicitly considers QCVs and qubits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Note that this gate method is essentially equivalent to that proposed in Ref. [41]. Ignoring the Pauli errors for now, the two gate methods presented above implement gates which are sufficient for universal quantum computation for all types of QVs as they can generate an entangling gate F [by taking the phase function to be ϑ(q) = 0 for all q] and any rotation gate [as…”
Section: A a Universal Gate Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in fact not the case in the context of cluster state quantum computation, where it is not necessary to build the entire cluster ahead of the computational task to perform, but rather it is possible to build and consume the cluster during the computation itself (see, e.g., Refs. [71][72][73]). …”
Section: Robustness Of the Graph-state Generation Against Mechanimentioning
confidence: 99%