2019
DOI: 10.1002/slct.201900078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential Extraction of Coal Tar Pitch and Structural Characterization of Enriched Large Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Abstract: Four fractions separated sequentially from a coal tar pitch by two different methods are examined by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI TOF-MS) and 50/24 matrix analysis, to evaluate both separation effectiveness and characteristics of large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in variable fractions. Both Soxhlet extraction and anti-solvent precipitation can sequentially produce four fractions that have narrower molecular mass distribution with specific struc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While almost threequarters of the PP is soluble in toluene, the toluene-soluble fraction only accounts for 46% of the CTP. This is in line with previous reports [12,31,33] that petroleum pitch mainly consists of large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with long aliphatic side chains. These compounds are much more soluble in organic solvents than molecules from their coal tar pitch counterpart, in which the condensed aromatics with short alkyl side chains are more abundant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While almost threequarters of the PP is soluble in toluene, the toluene-soluble fraction only accounts for 46% of the CTP. This is in line with previous reports [12,31,33] that petroleum pitch mainly consists of large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with long aliphatic side chains. These compounds are much more soluble in organic solvents than molecules from their coal tar pitch counterpart, in which the condensed aromatics with short alkyl side chains are more abundant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…While this finding is in line with previous time-of-flight MS measurements [12], the mass resolution of the TOF MS was insufficient to distinguish the mass splitting of CH4/O (36.4 mDa), N/CH2 (12.6 mDa), and H4S/C3 (3.4 mDa). Thus, during these earlier measurements [12,31,33], only the dominant hydrocarbon components were considered while the heteroatom-containing molecules were S1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numberaverage molecular weight (M N ), the weight-average molecular weight (M W ), and the molecular weight distribution index (MWD) of three pitches were calculated, respectively, according to the following formulas. 30…”
Section: Raw Materials and Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed that large non-volatile biomolecules can be ionized intact when mixed with metal powder and/or the proper organic matrix. , The applications of MALDI and LDI to analyze petroleum-related products have been recently summarized in a review . MALDI, using a range of matrices and sample preparation methodologies, has been combined with time-of-flight (TOF) and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) for the analysis of various types of pitches derived from coal tar, lignin, and processed petroleum bottoms. Because aromatic molecules can effectively absorb laser energy and serve as a matrix, direct LDI is also commonly used for analysis of PAHs in heavy petroleum, pitch, , and soot formed in flame/combustion. ,, In comparison to MALDI, LDI is simpler in operation and frequently used to assess compositional changes of pitch during thermal treatment, where samples are fairly refractory with low solubility. However, it has been noted that LDI experimental variables, such as laser power, can have significant impacts on the resulting mass spectra of the samples and, consequently, affect the interpretation of mass spectrometric data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%