2018
DOI: 10.1002/qre.2332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential experimentation approach for robust design

Abstract: The Taguchi approach for robust design has been a common practice in industrial experimentation for many years. However, these designs possess serious disadvantages such as the inability to estimate control × control interactions. In this article, we propose the application of the R3 algorithm as an augmentation tool for Taguchi experiments. The augmented Taguchi designs were compared with its competitors, mixed resolution designs, and D‐optimal augmentation, using performance indicators. The results showed th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some related studies on sequential experimentation include Rios 41 in which the R3 algorithm was used to separate MEs from 2FIs in resolution III fractions and Misra 42 in which a technique called Quarterfold was used to separate 2FIs from each other in resolution IV fractions. In addition, Rios 43 presented a method to eliminate multicollinearity and Rios 44 presented a sequential experimentation approach for robust designs. A direct comparison with these studies is presented in Table 17.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed Methods Against Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some related studies on sequential experimentation include Rios 41 in which the R3 algorithm was used to separate MEs from 2FIs in resolution III fractions and Misra 42 in which a technique called Quarterfold was used to separate 2FIs from each other in resolution IV fractions. In addition, Rios 43 presented a method to eliminate multicollinearity and Rios 44 presented a sequential experimentation approach for robust designs. A direct comparison with these studies is presented in Table 17.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed Methods Against Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) Type II error is the number of significant terms missing in the model [36]. % Type II measure the percentage of times that the models showed significant missing terms during the simulations:…”
Section: Run Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%