1994
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1656(94)90117-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of viable and non-viable yeast using dielectrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
181
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
181
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, work has demonstrated that DEP can be used to examine the effect of drugs on cells, such as the effect of nystatin on erythrocytes (5) or the response of neutrophils to activation by chemotactic factors (6). Since populations of particles may experience forces acting in different directions within specific frequency windows, separation has been demonstrated for mixtures of viable and non-viable yeast cells (7), and CD34+ cells from bone marrow, which can be separated from human blood (8). Other demonstrations of cell separation have been made in separating breast cancer cells from blood, erythrocytes with and without malarial parasite infection, B-and T-lymphocytes, and different types of viruses in solution (9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: By Exploiting the Fact That Different Particles May Experienmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, work has demonstrated that DEP can be used to examine the effect of drugs on cells, such as the effect of nystatin on erythrocytes (5) or the response of neutrophils to activation by chemotactic factors (6). Since populations of particles may experience forces acting in different directions within specific frequency windows, separation has been demonstrated for mixtures of viable and non-viable yeast cells (7), and CD34+ cells from bone marrow, which can be separated from human blood (8). Other demonstrations of cell separation have been made in separating breast cancer cells from blood, erythrocytes with and without malarial parasite infection, B-and T-lymphocytes, and different types of viruses in solution (9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: By Exploiting the Fact That Different Particles May Experienmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Another attractive feature of the DEP force is that cells can be either attracted (positive DEP [pDEP]) or repelled (negative DEP [nDEP]) by changing the conductivity difference between the cell and the surrounding medium. Owing to these features, the DEP force has been widely employed for cell separation, 15 electroinjection, 16 electrofusion 17 and electroporation. 18 Despite these advantages and developments, however, micro-scale electrodes that were used for generating the DEP force required complex photolithography and microfabrication processes that must be performed in specialized cleanroom facilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the particle polarisability compared with the suspending medium, the particle moves either towards the location with the greatest electric field gradient (positive DEP), or location away from the highest electric field gradient (negative DEP) (Pohl, 1978). DEPbased techniques have been successfully used for many biological applications to date, such as separations of viable and nonviable yeast cells (Huang et al, 1992;Markx et al, 1994), separation of live and heat-treated listeria bacteria (Li and Bashir, 2002), isolation and detection of sparse cancer cells, concentration of cells from dilute suspensions, and trapping and positioning of individual cells for characterization (Wang et al, 1997). Among these, the simplest method of practical dielectrophoretic separation is that of flow separation by using microfabricated interdigitated electrode array at the bottom of the microfluidic devices (Hughes, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%