2004
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2004.9628316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of scales on a broad, shallow turbulent flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In studying shallow free-surface flows most attention has been traditionally paid to their small-scale three-dimensional structure [2] while the importance of large-scale dynamics for transport processes and energy transfer in these flows has only lately been recognised. In a recent review of the problem, Jirka [1] suggests three key mechanisms forming large-scale coherent structures in shallow flows: (I) topographic forcing when boundary features such as islands or groynes create a strong transverse shear layer generating quasi-two-dimensional vortices [3]; (II) internal transverse shear instabilities due to lateral variations of hydrodynamic characteristics, occurring, for instance, in shallow jets or wakes [4]; and (III) secondary instabilities of the base flow which may take place as a result of internal fluctuations even in flows with negligible time-averaged transverse gradients in turbulence properties. As an example, this third mechanism may well be responsible for large-scale flow structures in wide rivers reported in Yokosi [5], Grinvald and Nikora [6], and Nikora [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studying shallow free-surface flows most attention has been traditionally paid to their small-scale three-dimensional structure [2] while the importance of large-scale dynamics for transport processes and energy transfer in these flows has only lately been recognised. In a recent review of the problem, Jirka [1] suggests three key mechanisms forming large-scale coherent structures in shallow flows: (I) topographic forcing when boundary features such as islands or groynes create a strong transverse shear layer generating quasi-two-dimensional vortices [3]; (II) internal transverse shear instabilities due to lateral variations of hydrodynamic characteristics, occurring, for instance, in shallow jets or wakes [4]; and (III) secondary instabilities of the base flow which may take place as a result of internal fluctuations even in flows with negligible time-averaged transverse gradients in turbulence properties. As an example, this third mechanism may well be responsible for large-scale flow structures in wide rivers reported in Yokosi [5], Grinvald and Nikora [6], and Nikora [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General kinetic energy spectra are suggested by Nikora [2005]spanning micro‐ to macroturbulence to longer scales, where the low frequency‐wavenumber macroturbulence is hypothesized to be white noise scaled with depth and width associated with hydraulic phenomenon with the intermediate frequencies rolling‐off as f −1 , thought to be representative for the transition from 2D horizontal turbulence to 3D turbulence [e.g., Carrasco and Vionnet , 2004]. At the higher frequencies the energy is expected to roll off as a 53 Kolmogorov slope based on the assumption of isotropic turbulence at higher frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the frequency domain, decay in coherence is caused by either a change in amplitude or a shift in frequency relative to a background noise [ Bendant and Piersol , 2000]. Decrease in coherence can also occur in the presence of an inverse energy cascade, where energy is transferred to the low‐frequency motions from higher frequency turbulence [ Carrasco and Vionnet , 2004]; however, there is no evidence of a spectral peak in the high‐frequency range from which the energy can be transferred. In the spatial domain, coherence of vortical motions advected downstream by the mean flow can decrease owing to distortions caused by shear and accelerations of the mean flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%