1988
DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(88)80006-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of protein mixtures by bioran® porous glass membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peptide hydrodynamic radius (rs) was estimated from MW according to Schnabel et al (1988) (Table I). Charge and isoelectric point of each peptide were calculated from dissociated constants and ionic groups according to Skoog and Wichman (1989) (Table I).…”
Section: Identification Of Peptides and Selection Of Tracersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptide hydrodynamic radius (rs) was estimated from MW according to Schnabel et al (1988) (Table I). Charge and isoelectric point of each peptide were calculated from dissociated constants and ionic groups according to Skoog and Wichman (1989) (Table I).…”
Section: Identification Of Peptides and Selection Of Tracersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the deposited particle layer might increase rejection by a sieving effect or depth filtration. Moreover, as discussed above, the fouling layer on membrane M1 consisted only of macromolecular proteins (250 kDa ≈ 11 nm using d = 0.007 M 0.4 ) . Thus, as introduced by Kuberkar and Davis, already deposited particle might sieve the macromolecular proteins or delay their transport to the membrane surface, eventually lowering pore blockage and increasing DOC rejection…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This opens up the possibility of using steam sterilization for the nanoporous carbon membranes and modules, which could significantly reduce the bioburden in downstream processing operations. To verify the feasibility of performing steam sterilization, an untreated nanoporous carbon membrane was exposed to stream at 120°C for 30 min at a pressure of 1 atm (1,17). The performance characteristics of the membrane after exposure to steam are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%