2013
DOI: 10.7567/jjap.52.026601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of Different Sized Nanoparticles with Time Using a Rotational Flow

Abstract: In this paper, we describe the development of a microfluidic centrifuge with two inlets and two outlets potentially capable of rapidly separating nanoparticles and nanovesicles. Compared with the microfluidic centrifuge with a single inlet and outlet, the 2 ×2 microfluidic centrifuge gives improved centrifugation performance by increasing momentum flux transfer, angular velocity, and centrifugal acceleration. The center of flow rotation and the symmetry of the horizontal velocity in the microchamber were exami… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, smaller and less dense particles are less deflected toward the outer wall, thereby remaining near the inner wall (Figure 12A). Using a similar strategy, Kwon et al 304 separated 300 and 700 nm particles based on their velocity and centrifugation time. While centrifugal microfluidic technology has been extensively used for manipulation, sorting, and analysis of biological particles like cells, 303,305−307 the potential of this approach for isolation of EVs has rarely been studied.…”
Section: Label-free Microfluidic Methods For Exosome Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, smaller and less dense particles are less deflected toward the outer wall, thereby remaining near the inner wall (Figure 12A). Using a similar strategy, Kwon et al 304 separated 300 and 700 nm particles based on their velocity and centrifugation time. While centrifugal microfluidic technology has been extensively used for manipulation, sorting, and analysis of biological particles like cells, 303,305−307 the potential of this approach for isolation of EVs has rarely been studied.…”
Section: Label-free Microfluidic Methods For Exosome Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…308 Despite the advantages of centrifugal microfluidics, it is noted that this method does not offer continuous separation like other microfluidic methods. 301,[303][304][305]307,308 In addition, these platforms are relatively expensive to apply for nanoscale separation, and several challenges remain, including stable operation in the absence of a density gradient, minimizing wall shear effects, and tuning device geometry and retention times in the microchannels. 301,[303][304][305]307,308 CONCLUSION With significant attention being paid to the potential use of exosomes for clinical applications as diagnostic and therapeutic tools, it is important to understand the nature of exosomes versus other EVs.…”
Section: Label-free Microfluidic Methods For Exosome Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…72,73 However, it is difficult to choose a suitable gradient chemical and it requires a longer preparation time to apply the gradient. 74 Arosio et al developed a density-free centrifugal microfluidic technique that does not rely on wall interactions like sedimentation field flow fractionation, and requires a shorter time than conventional centrifugation to sort nanoparticles without the need for sample dilution. In addition to the centrifugal force and hydrodynamic drag force, a buoyancy force is also present on the nanoparticles.…”
Section: Active Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…75 Another centrifugal microfluidic technique designed by Kwon et al was able to separate nanoparticles based on the difference in the velocity and duration of centrifugation between 300 nm and 700 nm particles using 2 × 2 inlets and outlets. 74,76 However, the requirement of for centrifugation equipment makes centrifugal microfluidics relatively expensive to apply for nanoparticle separation and it cannot perform continuous separation like other microfluidic techniques.…”
Section: Active Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the accelerating/decelerating time for centrifuges is significant, scaling up a batch operation results in unwanted downtime. The efforts for continuous‐flow centrifugal separation have been restricted to microfluidics methods . Due to the small radii of curvatures in these setups, the centrifugal forces generated are weak and thus separation is suitable for several hundred nanometers to micrometer‐sized particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%