2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation, enrichment and determination of ciprofloxacin using thermoseparating polymer aqueous two-phase system combined with high performance liquid chromatography in milk, egg, and shrimp samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this property, the phase-forming EOPO in ATPS could be effectively recycled and separated from the target product by heating (Show et al, 2011). Therefore, EOPO has been widely applied in ATPE, such as extraction of lipase (Show et al, 2011) and enrichment of ciprofloxacin (Chen et al, 2014). In recent years, a new thermosensitive polymer which named ethylene oxide-b-propylene oxide-bethylene oxide (EOPOEO) triblock copolymer has been applied in ATPE (De Oliveira, de Abreu Filho, & de Alcântara Pessôa Filho, 2007;Rabelo, Tambourgi, & Pessoa, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this property, the phase-forming EOPO in ATPS could be effectively recycled and separated from the target product by heating (Show et al, 2011). Therefore, EOPO has been widely applied in ATPE, such as extraction of lipase (Show et al, 2011) and enrichment of ciprofloxacin (Chen et al, 2014). In recent years, a new thermosensitive polymer which named ethylene oxide-b-propylene oxide-bethylene oxide (EOPOEO) triblock copolymer has been applied in ATPE (De Oliveira, de Abreu Filho, & de Alcântara Pessôa Filho, 2007;Rabelo, Tambourgi, & Pessoa, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this method reduces errors associated with the collection of extraction media, with solidified fatty acids providing a highly efficient extraction agent to further improve extraction recovery [35]. Sample preparation time (23.9 min) was much shorter than SPE (150 h, 22 h, and 260 min) [11,22,23], SPME (55 min) [46], and TPATPS (14 h) [51]. SPE and SPME require intensive washing of the extraction column with organic solvent [11,22] or a long vortex time (~22 h) [23] to improve extraction recovery, whereas ATPS requires 2 h to form the aqueous two-phase system and 12 h to separate the extraction solution and extraction solvent.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Ea-sfam-sfo Methods With Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of analytical methods have been reported for the determination of CF including spectrophotometry, mass spectrophotometry, liquid chromatography, high performance liquid chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, and electrochemical techniques [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The free concentration is generally believed to be responsible for the toxic effects and bioavailable for organisms [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%