2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

48
262
4
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(319 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
48
262
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiments, we found that above average path length and below average efficiency of local connectivity within the RMT hub, particularly for smaller network densities, are positively associated with episodic memory and executive function. The importance of this hub with regard to episodic memory and executive function is consistent with the existing cognitive neuroscience literature (Banich et al, 2000;Milham et al, 2003a,b;Nyberg et al, 1996;Ragland et al, 2004;Spaniol et al, 2009;van Veen and Carter, 2005). To our knowledge, however, the specific relationship to these network connectivity measures is novel, as is the nature of the relationship.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In our experiments, we found that above average path length and below average efficiency of local connectivity within the RMT hub, particularly for smaller network densities, are positively associated with episodic memory and executive function. The importance of this hub with regard to episodic memory and executive function is consistent with the existing cognitive neuroscience literature (Banich et al, 2000;Milham et al, 2003a,b;Nyberg et al, 1996;Ragland et al, 2004;Spaniol et al, 2009;van Veen and Carter, 2005). To our knowledge, however, the specific relationship to these network connectivity measures is novel, as is the nature of the relationship.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Interestingly, stimulus conflict and response conflict have been shown to activate different regions of the ACC. In a study by van Veen and Carter (2005), (Stroop) stimulus conflict was associated with stronger activation in a caudal part of the dorsal ACC (BA 32/6), whereas response conflict was associated with stronger activation in the more rostral dorsal ACC (BA 32/24; for related findings, see Z. Chen, Lei, Ding, Li, & Chen, 2013;Kim, Kroger, & Kim, 2011).…”
Section: Avoidance Of Conflicting Stimuli or Responses (Or Both)?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, Lamb and colleagues (2000) showed that pretrial cues that provided information about the level of the upcoming target affected performance with RT benefits for valid and costs for invalid cues relative to noninformative neutral cues. Facilitation effects from sequential priming were assumed to occur relatively early, at a postsensory but preattentive stage (Han et al, 2000a;Kim et al, 1999;Lamb et al, 1998Lamb et al, ,2000Robertson, 1996;Schatz and Erlandson, 2003), whereas interference effects often have been associated with later response-related stages (Han et al, 1999;Kaufmann et al, 2005;van Veen and Carter, 2005).…”
Section: Interference and Facilitation In Global-local Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%