2010
DOI: 10.7763/ijcee.2010.v2.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separating Heart Sound from Lung Sound Using LabVIEW

Abstract: Abstract-Heart sounds interfere with lung sounds in a way that hampers the potential of respiratory sound analysis in terms of diagnosis of respiratory illness. This paper implements a VI for Heart Sound (HS) cancellation from Lung Sound (LS) records using the Advanced Signal Processing Toolkit of Lab VIEW 8.2. The method uses the multiresolution analysis of the wavelet approximation coefficients of the original signal to detect HS-included segments. Once the HS segments are identified, the method removes them… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, clinical respiratory sounds are complicated to get in practice, and the samples of lung sounds are small. Thus, the researchers have normally selected conventional machine learning techniques, such as hidden Markov model (HMM) [29], support vector machine (SVM) [30] artificial neural network (ANN) [28], and k-Nearest Neighbor [21], instead of a deep learning technique for categorizing the lung sounds [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, clinical respiratory sounds are complicated to get in practice, and the samples of lung sounds are small. Thus, the researchers have normally selected conventional machine learning techniques, such as hidden Markov model (HMM) [29], support vector machine (SVM) [30] artificial neural network (ANN) [28], and k-Nearest Neighbor [21], instead of a deep learning technique for categorizing the lung sounds [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, clinical respiratory sounds are complicated to get in practice, and the samples of lung sounds are small. Thus, the researchers have normally selected conventional machine learning techniques, such as hidden Markov model (HMM) [29], support vector machine (SVM) [30] artificial neural network (ANN) [28], and k-Nearest Neighbor [21], instead of a deep learning technique for categorizing the lung sounds [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the auscultation depends greatly on the medical skills and diagnostic experience of the physician, which are difficult to acquire. With the development of computer-based respiratory sounds, automatic lung sound recognition based on machine learning has an important clinical significance for the diagnosis of lung abnormalities [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical respiratory sounds are difficult to acquire in practice, and the sample set of lung sounds is often small. Therefore, researchers have generally chosen traditional machine learning methods, such as an artificial neural network (ANN) [9][14], hidden Markov model (HMM) [15][16], support vector machine (SVM) [17][18], or k-Nearest Neighbor [4], instead of a deep learning method for the classification of lung sounds. Chamberlain et al [19] attempted to recognize wheezes and crackles through deep learning conducted on 11,627 sounds recorded from 11 different auscultation locations on 284 patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%