2013 First International Symposium on Computing and Networking 2013
DOI: 10.1109/candar.2013.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEOS: Hardware Implementation of Real-Time Operating System for Adaptability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One solution uses the EDF algorithm too but with the maximum number of tasks being only 64, 25 and the other approach uses priorities instead of deadlines, which is less e±cient for realtime systems in terms of CPU utilization. 26 There are other solutions based on priorities or static scheduling [27][28][29] as well. These solutions are suitable for systems consisting of hard real-time tasks only.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One solution uses the EDF algorithm too but with the maximum number of tasks being only 64, 25 and the other approach uses priorities instead of deadlines, which is less e±cient for realtime systems in terms of CPU utilization. 26 There are other solutions based on priorities or static scheduling [27][28][29] as well. These solutions are suitable for systems consisting of hard real-time tasks only.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that most of these solutions use the static RMS scheduling algorithm and some of them use EDF. They use architecture of task sorting based on multiplexer trees or FIFO structures which leads into issues with scalability [1][2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several hardware architectures designed for data sorting or implementation of MIN/MAX queues have been developed so far. However, they all suffer from consuming too many LUT (Look-up Tables) resources and they have relatively high chip area costs in ASIC (in addition to FPGA) technologies as well [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%