2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentiment analysis tools in software engineering: A systematic mapping study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it is impossible to manually keep up with the huge flow of new information appearing on the Internet, this sub-field (directly related to automatically extracting opinions) has significantly evolved in the last decade (Dhana Laxmi et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2020). SA takes into account not only for investigating the positive or negative polarity of words and concepts, but also the syntactical tree of the sentence (Obaidi et al, 2022;Prager, 2006). The software makes an effort to analyse idiomatic and colloquial expressions, to provide meaning for negations, to change the polarity of words based on their proximity to other words (such as adverbs, adjectives, and conjunctions), and to account for certain functional-logic complements (Calefato et al, 2018;Hausmann et al, 2020).…”
Section: Study Background-sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is impossible to manually keep up with the huge flow of new information appearing on the Internet, this sub-field (directly related to automatically extracting opinions) has significantly evolved in the last decade (Dhana Laxmi et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2020). SA takes into account not only for investigating the positive or negative polarity of words and concepts, but also the syntactical tree of the sentence (Obaidi et al, 2022;Prager, 2006). The software makes an effort to analyse idiomatic and colloquial expressions, to provide meaning for negations, to change the polarity of words based on their proximity to other words (such as adverbs, adjectives, and conjunctions), and to account for certain functional-logic complements (Calefato et al, 2018;Hausmann et al, 2020).…”
Section: Study Background-sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is impossible to manually keep up with the huge ow of new information appearing on the Internet, the eld of automatically extracting opinions has signi cantly been evolving in the last decade (Dhana Laxmi et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020). SA takes into account not only the positive or negative polarity of words and concepts, but also the syntactical tree of the sentence (Obaidi et al, 2022;Prager, 2006). The software makes an effort to analyze idiomatic and colloquial expressions, to provide meaning for negations, to change the polarity of words based on their proximity to other words (such as adverbs, adjectives, and conjunctions), and to account for certain functional-logic complements (Calefato et al, 2018;Hausmann et al, 2020).…”
Section: 2 Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software project management (SPM) process is crucial for effectively planning, executing, monitoring, and controlling software projects within specified constraints. In recent times, the application of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) frameworks to support SPM has gained significant attention (Obaidi et al, 2022;Vusumuzi & Mfowabo, 2022;Sheoraj and Sungkur, 2022). Artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging technology that has the potential to enhance SPM by providing intelligent and automated solutions for various SPM tasks (Mishra et al, 2023;Vusumuzi & Mfowabo, 2022; Karenkamp et al, 2020;Dam et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Obaidi et al (2022), it is highlighted the importance of understanding the impact and implications of ML and DL frameworks in different contexts and environments. The study envisaged that developing countries face unique challenges in SPM, such as limited resources, diverse stakeholders, cultural differences, and rapid changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%