2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentencing disparities for juvenile offenders sentenced to adult prisons: An individual and contextual analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I find significant variation in punishment severity by race across Pennsylvania counties, but no statistically significant contextual effects. The inability of the contextual measures to affect racial disparities in punishment decisions is puzzling in light of prior theory and research on race and punishment.It may be that other, less explored contextual factors—such as crime level (see, e.g., Britt, 2000), region of country (see, e.g., Carmichael, 2010), urbanization (see, e.g., Feld, 1999), political context (see, e.g., Helms, 2009), or religious context (see, e.g., Fearn, 2005) can better explain this variation. Indeed, in the present analysis concentrated disadvantage and crime rates were negatively associated with incarceration (but not detention) outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I find significant variation in punishment severity by race across Pennsylvania counties, but no statistically significant contextual effects. The inability of the contextual measures to affect racial disparities in punishment decisions is puzzling in light of prior theory and research on race and punishment.It may be that other, less explored contextual factors—such as crime level (see, e.g., Britt, 2000), region of country (see, e.g., Carmichael, 2010), urbanization (see, e.g., Feld, 1999), political context (see, e.g., Helms, 2009), or religious context (see, e.g., Fearn, 2005) can better explain this variation. Indeed, in the present analysis concentrated disadvantage and crime rates were negatively associated with incarceration (but not detention) outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies found that cities with larger African-American populations had more police killings (Sorenson, Marquart & Brock 1993) and more police killings of African Americans (Jacobs and O'Brien 1998). Other studies found a link between minority threat and other forms of social control including police force size ( (Nalla, Lynch & Leiber 1997;Jackson 1989) or prisons and jails (Jacobs & Helms 1999), higher arrest rates (Liska et al 1984), greater use of jails (Carmichael 2005); longer sentence of incarceration (Carmichael & Burgos 2012;Carmichael 2010) and more death sentences (Jacobs & Carmichael 2004). Despite such substantial support for the threat hypothesis in the U.S., few studies have assessed whether or not threat hypotheses are applicable in Canada and, in particular, if and how minority presence may influence criminal justice policies and practices in that country.…”
Section: Minority Threat Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An analysis of 16-year-old defendants in New York City criminal courts during 1992–1993 also found that neither race nor Latino ethnicity was significant in regression models of incarceration outcomes (Kupchik, 2006). Carmichael (2010) found that while both race and Hispanic ethnicity were not significant in estimates of sentence length for a sample of juveniles convicted in adult courts during the period of 1983–2001, Black defendants convicted of murder received significantly shorter sentences than their White counterparts.…”
Section: Prior Research On Race Ethnicity and Punishmentmentioning
confidence: 89%