2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71496-5_53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentence Level Sentiment Analysis in the Presence of Conjuncts Using Linguistic Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Wilson et al [32] raise the question of obtaining clause-level opinion strength as a preparation step for sentence-level sentiment analysis. In [33,34] researchers focused on sentence polarities separately, again to obtain sentence polarities more correctly, with the goal of improving review polarity in turn. The first line polarity has also been used as a feature by [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Wilson et al [32] raise the question of obtaining clause-level opinion strength as a preparation step for sentence-level sentiment analysis. In [33,34] researchers focused on sentence polarities separately, again to obtain sentence polarities more correctly, with the goal of improving review polarity in turn. The first line polarity has also been used as a feature by [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the SD scheme is especially popular in parser evaluation works (Cer et al 2010;Nivre et al 2010;Clegg and Shepherd 2007;Miwa et al 2010;Foster et al 2011), and several parsers are capable of producing the scheme either natively or by conversion, including the Charniak-Johnson parser (Charniak and Johnson 2005), the Stanford parser (Klein and Manning 2003), the Clear parser Choi and Palmer (2011), the parser of Tratz and Hovy (2011), and naturally any dependency parser that can be trained from a treebank, such as the MaltParser (Nivre et al 2007), the MSTParser (McDonald et al 2006) or the MateTools parser (Bohnet 2010). The scheme was originally intended to be applicationoriented, and it has indeed been successfully used in applications, particularly in the biomedical domain (Björne et al 2010;Miyao et al 2009;Qian and Zhou 2012), and otherwise in opinion extraction (Zhuang et al 2006) and sentiment analysis (Meena and Prabhakar 2007).…”
Section: Dependency Annotation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…No matter what kind of topic representation (probabilistic topic model, a set of keywords, or other form) is used, we should guarantee that the contents of different topics in documents can be correctly separated. Also, many researchers [4,7,12,14] agree that the semantics of expression is critical in performing sentiment analysis. Take the sentence "He is cute, still I do not like him."…”
Section: Fig 1 a Web Blog Text Snippetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some (e.g., [5,8,19]) study the semantic orientation (positive or negative) of English words, especially adjectives. Some (e.g., [12]) focus on sentence level sentiment analysis; they use language grammar based rules and adopt words' semantic orientation information to obtain the sentiment polarity of a sentence. A majority of the remaining works focus on document level sentiment analysis; some (e.g., [3,4,15,18]) use machine learning classifiers to determine the overall sentiment of a document, some [10] performs feature level sentiment analysis and offer sentiment summary of product reviews as commercial products usually contain several important features based on which users can make choice.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation