2015 7th International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering &Amp; Technology (ICETET) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icetet.2015.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensorless Field Oriented Control of PMSM Drive System for Automotive Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since there is 6 voltage references and only 5 legs, a reduction in the number of voltage references is required. Reduction of the number of voltage references can be made by using an inverse lookup table [2,11], this is realized by adding another ZSS in accordance to the converter configuration in five-leg mode.…”
Section: Reconfigurable Control Of the Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since there is 6 voltage references and only 5 legs, a reduction in the number of voltage references is required. Reduction of the number of voltage references can be made by using an inverse lookup table [2,11], this is realized by adding another ZSS in accordance to the converter configuration in five-leg mode.…”
Section: Reconfigurable Control Of the Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers in the fault tolerant converter applications have obtained promising results by using an additional leg to guarantee the continuity of service, in [2], the authors studied the fault tolerant six-leg converter for a Wind Energy Conversion System (WECS) with a Doubly-Fed Induction Generator (DFIG). In [11][12][13][14], the authors treated the fault detection, isolation and compensation as an open-circuit and short-circuit tolerant motor drive system and discusses about fault tolerant AC-DC-AC single-phase to three-phase converter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the sliding mode algorithm [2,3] requires a double integration for currents and fluxes; the Butterworth method presented in [4] present the same double integration plus the need for an additional PI regulator; the dead-beat direct control in [5] is not really ideal for flux estimation, since it looks only at the end torque result; the adaptive model of [6] or, more recently, [7,8] could be very calculation heavy; the methods compared in [9] are just for machines with magnets. Moreover, a flux observer is required for any sensorless application such as permanent magnets [10], reluctance [11], or induction machines [12] that all use the machine equations to find the rotor flux angle, since this operation is intended for applications without the direct measurement of the rotor position and speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%