2015
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2014.2353215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensorless Control of PMSM for the Whole Speed Range Using Two-Degree-of-Freedom Current Control and HF Test Current Injection for Low-Speed Range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the mechanical position sensors, such as resolvers and encoders, are vulnerable to strong vibration, high operating temperature and humid atmosphere, sensorless control of PMSM has been the research focus by extracting the position information from terminal voltages and currents, which can be separated into saliency-and model-based sensorless methods [4,5]. The saliency-based highfrequency signal injection methods, which exploits rotor position dependent inductance properties, are appropriate only for low and zero speeds due to the constraints of constant DC voltage and high-frequency noise [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the mechanical position sensors, such as resolvers and encoders, are vulnerable to strong vibration, high operating temperature and humid atmosphere, sensorless control of PMSM has been the research focus by extracting the position information from terminal voltages and currents, which can be separated into saliency-and model-based sensorless methods [4,5]. The saliency-based highfrequency signal injection methods, which exploits rotor position dependent inductance properties, are appropriate only for low and zero speeds due to the constraints of constant DC voltage and high-frequency noise [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is represented by the fundamental excitation techniques [1][2][3][4][5][6], which estimate the rotor speed and position exploiting the back electromotive force generated by the permanent magnet. The second one corresponds to the saliency tracking techniques [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], which, injecting a persistent highfrequency signal, exploit the rotor anisotropy to reconstruct its position. The former methods do not require any additional signal injection, but, in case of techniques based on the estimation of the back electromotive force (EMF), they hardly operate at low speeds and surely not at standstill due to the lack of useful information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision of the estimated position is highly affected especially at low-speed operation by the accuracy in motor parameters and nonlinearity in inverter output voltage such as dead-time effect [5]. The magnitude of the back-EMF at low-speed range is small, in which the back-EMF based sensorless method is primarily useful at medium-speed or higher [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%