2003
DOI: 10.1017/s001216220300152x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensorimotor recovery in children after traumatic brain injury: analyses of gait, gross motor, and fine motor skills

Abstract: The recovery of gait, gross motor proficiency, and hand function was examined in 23 children (13 males, 10 females; age 4 years 7 months to 15 years 10 months) with traumatic brain injury (TBI) over five months of in patient rehabilitation. We used gait analysis, the Gross Motor Function Measure, the Developmental Hand Function Test, and the Purdue Pegboard test. Brain injury had been severe (initial Glasgow Coma Scale GCS <8) in 17 children and moderate (GCS 8-10) in six children. Compared with healthy contro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Most studies covered in that review used traditional paper-and-pencil tests of attention, often not correcting for confounding effects of deficits in processing speed or visuomotor functions that may co-occur after TBI. 11,12 The ANT, which controls for these confounders, revealed no evidence for impaired alerting, orienting, or executive attention, possibly reflecting the importance of correcting for processing speed and visuomotor functions in tests of attention. The results further revealed no evidence for attention deficits after mild RF2 TBI, while indicating that children with mild RF+ TBI or moderate/severe TBI have increased lapses of attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 Most studies covered in that review used traditional paper-and-pencil tests of attention, often not correcting for confounding effects of deficits in processing speed or visuomotor functions that may co-occur after TBI. 11,12 The ANT, which controls for these confounders, revealed no evidence for impaired alerting, orienting, or executive attention, possibly reflecting the importance of correcting for processing speed and visuomotor functions in tests of attention. The results further revealed no evidence for attention deficits after mild RF2 TBI, while indicating that children with mild RF+ TBI or moderate/severe TBI have increased lapses of attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…8 The disparate findings in the literature may originate partly from the use of traditional paper-and-pencil tests, which often lack the ability to isolate aspects of attention from processing speed and visuomotor coordination, 8,10 while these functions have consistently been found to be affected after TBI. 11,12 The Attention Network Test (ANT) has been developed to measure the efficiency of alerting, orienting, and executive attention and overcomes drawbacks of traditional measures by correcting for processing speed and minimizing the load on visuomotor functions. 13 One study used the ANT to investigate attention in adolescents with mild TBI, identifying a deficit in executive attention 1 month postinjury.…”
Section: What This Study Addsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…manifest throughout the first month of recovery following brain injury (Carmichael, 2003b;Kuhtz-Buschbeck et al, 2003;Sbordone et al, 1995;Wade et al, 1985). As a result, it is not surprising that the majority of studies tracking neuroplastic responses to brain injury have focused on this critical postinjury time period.…”
Section: Nagamoto-combs Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chaplin et al showed impairment in integrative gross motor and speeded fine motor function in a sample of 14 children 16 months after severe TBI [18]. KuhtzBuschbeck et al demonstrated deficits in fine motor skills, speed, and coordination in 23 children 8 months after TBI [19]. Gray et al showed subclinical bradykinesia with impaired complex and simple reaction time in a sample of 24 persons 1 year after TBI [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%