2015
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-0437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury and Attention Deficit

Abstract: BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) on attention, a prerequisite for behavioral and neurocognitive functioning.METHODS: Children aged 6 to 13 years who were diagnosed with TBI (n = 113; mean 1.7 years postinjury) were compared with children with a trauma control injury (not involving the head) (n = 53). TBI severity was defined as mild TBI with or without risk factors for complicated TBI (mild RF+ TBI, n = 52; mild RF2 TBI, n = 24) or moderate/severe TBI (n = 37). B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to interpret their increased center activity is that injured females are less anxious and more exploratory. However, the finding is also consistent with a possible deficit in impulse control and disinhibition (Königs et al, 2015; Max et al, 2005; Konrad et al, 2000). Also, it is plausible to attribute the declines in hippocampal neurogenesis to the memory deficit, but that decline was only observed in female rats, though male rats also showed memory deficits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…One way to interpret their increased center activity is that injured females are less anxious and more exploratory. However, the finding is also consistent with a possible deficit in impulse control and disinhibition (Königs et al, 2015; Max et al, 2005; Konrad et al, 2000). Also, it is plausible to attribute the declines in hippocampal neurogenesis to the memory deficit, but that decline was only observed in female rats, though male rats also showed memory deficits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This study compared a group of 36 children with TBI to a group of 27 children with trauma control (TC) injury not involving the head, in order to control for pre‐injury risk factors of traumatic injury [Max et al, ]. Data were collected as part of a follow‐up on a consecutive cohort that was retrospectively recruited from three university‐affiliated level I trauma centers and three rehabilitation centers in the Netherlands [Königs et al, ]. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age 8–14 years at time of follow‐up; (2) proficient in the Dutch language; (3) children in the TBI group were required to have a history of hospital admission with a clinical diagnosis of either: (a) mild TBI (GCS = 15–13, loss of consciousness [LOC] duration ≤ 30 min, post‐traumatic amnesia [PTA] duration ≤ 1 h) with at least one of the following risk factors for complicated TBI (mild RF+ TBI) according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies guidelines on mild TBI: impaired consciousness (GCS = 13–14), focal neurological deficits, persistent vomiting (≥ 3 episodes), post‐injury epileptic seizure, progressive headache and abnormal head CT‐scan [Vos and Battistin, ]; or (b) moderate/severe TBI (GCS = 12–3, LOC duration > 30 min, PTA duration > 1 h [Teasdale and Jennett, ]); and (4) children in the TC group were required to have a history of hospital admission for traumatic injuries below the clavicles [American College of Surgeons, ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Faber et al (2016) and Muscara et al (2008) operationalized inhibition and cognitive flexibility abilities by taking completion time and total number of errors on the CWIT inhibition and inhibition/switching tasks. Of note, there were suggestions that EF deficits in childhood TBI survivors may be confounded by impaired processing speed (Ginstfeldt & Emanuelson, 2010;K€ onigs et al, 2015).…”
Section: Predictors Of Ef Performance At 16-year Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%