2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2015.7178728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor selection with correlated measurements for target tracking in wireless sensor networks

Abstract: We study the problem of adaptive sensor management for target tracking, where at every instant we search for the best sensors to be activated at the next time step. In our problem formulation, the measurements may be corrupted by correlated noises, and the impact of correlated measurements on sensor selection is studied. Specifically, we adopt an alteruative conditional posterior Cramer-Rao lower bound (C-PCRLB) as the optimization criterion for sensor selection, where the trace of the conditional Fisher infor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the method selects one sensor node for the tasks at each step and does not consider the locations correlations of the sensing nodes. Literature [18,19] adopt an alternative conditional posterior Cramér-Rao lower bound (C-PCRLB) as the optimization criterion for node selection. Although the total number of participating nodes is limited by a time window, nodes are selected independently without considering the correlation among the observation values of nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the method selects one sensor node for the tasks at each step and does not consider the locations correlations of the sensing nodes. Literature [18,19] adopt an alternative conditional posterior Cramér-Rao lower bound (C-PCRLB) as the optimization criterion for node selection. Although the total number of participating nodes is limited by a time window, nodes are selected independently without considering the correlation among the observation values of nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Camera measurement noise is known to be statistically independent. RSSI measurement noise is considered correlated in many works [48][49][50] due to the influence of the environment when models such as (2) are adopted. However, as will be explained in Section 5 the RSSI measurement noise in our scheme has a negligible level of correlation and assuming uncorrelated measurement noise involves no practical influence in our scheme enabling the integration of RSSI measurements in RBFs.…”
Section: Camera and Rssi Measurement Integration Using Distributed Eifsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the application of SDR in (33), the homogeneous QCQP leads to an SDP with a smaller problem size. We refer the readers to [22,Sec. V] and [20, Sec. V] for more details on the application of bilinear programming and SDR.…”
Section: Sensor Selection By Maximizing Trace Of Fisher Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%