2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21227492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor Selection and State Estimation for Unobservable and Non-Linear System Models

Abstract: To comply with the increasing complexity of new mechatronic systems and stricter safety regulations, advanced estimation algorithms are currently undergoing a transformation towards higher model complexity. However, more complex models often face issues regarding the observability and computational effort needed. Moreover, sensor selection is often still conducted pragmatically based on experience and convenience, whereas a more cost-effective approach would be to evaluate the sensor performance based on its e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensors are usually fixed, so that the latency-accuracy tradeoff is not addressed, and local computation need not relate to communication latency. Similar considerations also apply to literature in sensor selection and resource allocation [24], [25], [26], [27], which considers sensing design in the presence of budget constraints, with little attention to impact of delays (or even dynamics) on performance. Also in recent work on co-design of sensing, estimation, and control [28], [29], there is still no unifying framework that ties adaptive local processing and sensing design with variable computation and communication delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Sensors are usually fixed, so that the latency-accuracy tradeoff is not addressed, and local computation need not relate to communication latency. Similar considerations also apply to literature in sensor selection and resource allocation [24], [25], [26], [27], which considers sensing design in the presence of budget constraints, with little attention to impact of delays (or even dynamics) on performance. Also in recent work on co-design of sensing, estimation, and control [28], [29], there is still no unifying framework that ties adaptive local processing and sensing design with variable computation and communication delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…where x k ∈ R n collects the variables (state) of the system, A k ∈ R n×n is the state matrix, and white noise w k ∼ N (0, W k ) captures model uncertainty. Such class of models is widely used in control applications, by virtue of their simplicity but also powerful expressiveness [28], [66]- [69]. For example, a standard approach in control of systems modeled through nonlinear differential equations is to approximate the original model as a parameter-or time-varying linear system, for which efficient control techniques are known [28], [70], [71].…”
Section: A System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, we employ the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method to solve differential Equation ( 5) and simulate the true state of the SC from the initial time. For this simulation, we use a discrete step length of 1/3 s. The true measurement values for case 1 and case 2 at each time instant k are computed using Equations ( 17) and (18), respectively. It is assumed that the measurement information has been preprocessed, including time synchronization.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation 41 Simulation Initializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these papers, they also show that, when using the measurements from the Sun sensor and the spectrometer sensor, the estimation accuracy of the absolute state of the SC can also be improved. Thus, like the study [18] that proposes a sensor selection algorithm to assess and compare the effects of different sensors on the accuracy of state estimation, for the Taiji mission, choosing the right sensors to model observation schemes for estimating the state of the SCs is an important study for the mission design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%