2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00312-7_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensor Beams, Obstacles, and Possible Paths

Abstract: Summary. This paper introduces a problem in which an agent (robot, human, or animal) travels among obstacles and binary detection beams. The task is to determine the possible agent path based only on the binary sensor data. This is a basic filtering problem encountered in many settings, which may arise from physical sensor beams or virtual beams that are derived from other sensing modalities. Methods are given for three alternative representations: 1) the possible sequences of regions visited, 2) path descript… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motivation: Homotopy Invariant in (R 2 − O) We are interested in constructing computable homotopy invariants for trajectories in a configuration space that are amenable to graph search-based path planning. To that end there is a very simple construction for configuration spaces of the form R 2 − O (Euclidean plane punctured by obstacles) (Grigoriev and Slissenko 1998;Hershberger and Snoeyink 1991;Tovar et al 2008;Bhattacharya et al 2015;Kim et al 2014): We start by placing representative points, ζ i , inside the i th connected component of the obstacles, O i ⊂ O. We then construct non-intersecting rays, r 1 , r 2 , · · · , r m , emanating from the representative points (this is always possible, for example, by choosing the rays to be parallel to each other).…”
Section: Configuration Spaces With Free Fundamental Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivation: Homotopy Invariant in (R 2 − O) We are interested in constructing computable homotopy invariants for trajectories in a configuration space that are amenable to graph search-based path planning. To that end there is a very simple construction for configuration spaces of the form R 2 − O (Euclidean plane punctured by obstacles) (Grigoriev and Slissenko 1998;Hershberger and Snoeyink 1991;Tovar et al 2008;Bhattacharya et al 2015;Kim et al 2014): We start by placing representative points, ζ i , inside the i th connected component of the obstacles, O i ⊂ O. We then construct non-intersecting rays, r 1 , r 2 , · · · , r m , emanating from the representative points (this is always possible, for example, by choosing the rays to be parallel to each other).…”
Section: Configuration Spaces With Free Fundamental Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filter 19 (Gap Navigation Tree) We describe a filter over an I-space I trees of rooted trees [51]. Each tree captures some critical structure of the environment and is combinatorially equivalent to the notion of a shortest path tree that arises in visibility algorithms [?].…”
Section: Gap Navigation Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there are no subtrees labeled g ′ and g ′′ , then new child nodes corresponding to g ′ and g ′′ are attached to the root. More details appear in [37,51].…”
Section: Gap Navigation Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, in [23] the problem in which one agent travels among obstacles and binary detection beams was considered. Algorithms were proposed to determine possible paths followed by an agent based only on binary sensor data from a set of sensor beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%