1993
DOI: 10.1177/0013164493053003027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Positive Predictive Value as Measures of Prediction Accuracy: The Case of the Eat-26

Abstract: Recently, investigators have identified several levels of severity among people suffering from eating disorders. One of the more commonly used scales for screening people with eating disorders is the 26-item version of the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26). Although decisions such as assigning individuals to treatment and control groups are often determined by the score on the EAT-26, researchers have not examined the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the scale. In the present study, 231 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…About one third of sub-population at risk to eating disorders stated that they heard negative comments about their weight from peers and family members, indicating social pressure; surprisingly, some 70% of them were convinced about the need to be thin on their wedding night. eating disorders [13,20]. The prevalence of eating disorders risk found in this study (31.4%) is higher than what was reported by number of earlier studies targeting the UAE population; there, scores above the EAT-26 cutoff did not exceed a quarter of the surveyed population [7,25,26].…”
Section: A Significant Positive Correlation Was Found Between Eat-26 contrasting
confidence: 70%
“…About one third of sub-population at risk to eating disorders stated that they heard negative comments about their weight from peers and family members, indicating social pressure; surprisingly, some 70% of them were convinced about the need to be thin on their wedding night. eating disorders [13,20]. The prevalence of eating disorders risk found in this study (31.4%) is higher than what was reported by number of earlier studies targeting the UAE population; there, scores above the EAT-26 cutoff did not exceed a quarter of the surveyed population [7,25,26].…”
Section: A Significant Positive Correlation Was Found Between Eat-26 contrasting
confidence: 70%
“…It follows from this that it is impossible to decide con dently which girls to follow up further and eventually offer treatment on the basis of the EAT-12 as the screening tool. This is in line with ndings from use of the EAT-26 and EAT-40 (35). Table 2 that EDI is the questionnaire with most satisfactory sensitivity and speci city.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Reliability information for either the total EAT score or one or more factor scores for their sample was reported in 78 (36.28%) studies. Seven of these studies were excluded from further analysis because the authors modified the measure or used different factors based on their own factor analysis of the EAT (see [ 26 , 28 - 30 , 69 - 135 ] for included studies). Results indicate that the sample-weighted mean estimates of internal consistency were .81 for the EAT-40 and .86 for the EAT-26.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests that the EDI can distinguish individuals with AN [ 25 ] and BN [ 29 ] from nonclinical respondents. Conversely, the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT; [ 26 ]) assesses thoughts and behaviors related to anorexia nervosa and may be administered in the original 40-item version or a 26-item short form (EAT-26; [ 28 ]), both of which are typically highly correlated ( r = .98; [ 30 ]). The EAT has also been shown to discriminate individuals with bulimia nervosa from control participants [ 29 ], eating disordered patients and controls, and binge eating patients from those with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa [ 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%