2014
DOI: 10.1186/2050-2974-2-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring eating disorder attitudes and behaviors: a reliability generalization study

Abstract: BackgroundAlthough score reliability is a sample-dependent characteristic, researchers often only report reliability estimates from previous studies as justification for employing particular questionnaires in their research. The present study followed reliability generalization procedures to determine the mean score reliability of the Eating Disorder Inventory and its most commonly employed subscales (Drive for Thinness, Bulimia, and Body Dissatisfaction) and the Eating Attitudes Test as a way to better identi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(65 reference statements)
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Construct validity of both subscales has also been supported [25]. Internal validity of scores has been shown to be adequate in adult samples [26]. Cronbach’s alpha in the current study was .84 and .86 for body dissatisfaction, and .93 and .88 for drive for thinness, for men and women, respectively.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Construct validity of both subscales has also been supported [25]. Internal validity of scores has been shown to be adequate in adult samples [26]. Cronbach’s alpha in the current study was .84 and .86 for body dissatisfaction, and .93 and .88 for drive for thinness, for men and women, respectively.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Scores on the measures have previously demonstrated good evidence for validity and reliability in female adolescent samples (e.g., Garner, 1991;Gleaves et al, 2014) and adequate internal consistency in the present study. Higher scores indicate higher levels of risk for all variables except downward Dismantling prevention: Comparison of outcomes 8 appearance comparison and measures of media literacy for which higher scores are more desirable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Items are scored on a 0–3 scale and summed for the composite symptom score. The EAT‐26 has demonstrated good reliability and validity in women and men (Gleaves, Pearson, Ambwani, & Morey, ). Within the present study, the composite score exhibited good internal consistency for women ( α = .89) and men ( α = .81).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%