Sensitivity and specificity of programmed atrial stimulation for induction of supraventricular tachycardias

Abstract

Summary:The sensitivity and specificity of two programmed atrial stimulation protocols were studied in 92 consecutive patients undergoing electrophysiologic studies both with (35 patients) and without (57 patients) clinical supraventricular arrhythmias. Protocol I (P I) consisted of incremental atrial pacing to 2: 1 atrioventricular (AV) block and a single atrial extrastimulus scanned by 10 ms decrements through diastole to the atrial effective refractory period at a single drive-cycle length. Protocol I1 (P 11) included a second atrial extrastimulus scanned by 10 ms decrements through diastole at a single drivecycle length with the first extrastimulus set 20 ms from the atrial effective refractory period. Rapid atrial pacing at cycle lengths of 350, 300, and 250 ms was then performed with P II. P I was employed in all patients while P Il was studied in the final 48 patients only. Of the 35 patients with clinical atrial arrhythmias, 26 (74%) of their arrhythmias were induced with either P I (18/35; sensitivity=51%) and/or P II(12/17; sensitivity= 71 %). Of the 57 patients without clinical atrial arrhythmias (control group), atrial arrhythmias were induced in 11 (19%), 3 with P I (specificity 95 % ,54/57) and 8 with P I1 (specificity 74%, 23/31). The sensitivity of P 11 was higher (71 %), but its specificity was lower (74%) than P I(51% and 95 % , respectively; p < 0.05). The positive predictive value of P I1 was lower (60%) than that of P I(86%) (p<O.O5), but the negative predictive value (82%) and predictive accuracy (73%) were comparable to those of P I (76% and 78%, respectively). In conclusion, protocol 11 (P 11) including double extrastimuli and rapid atrial pacing can enhance sensitivity of programmed atrial stimulation in inducing atrial tachyarrhythmias, but results in lower specificity when compared to protocol I (P I).

Electronic Nose: Current Status and Future Trends

“…[41][42][43][44] Consequently, there are also efforts to mimic this human ability with electronic noses. 35,[45][46][47][48][49] Because of the different responses and sensitivities to the respective marker molecules, one needs to find which are the appropriate tasks for electronic noses.…”

“…The origin of a foul, putrid odor can be a lung abscess or an empyema but just as well an intranasal foreign body. 44 The main advantage of breath analysis, besides the detection of diseases directly related to the respiratory tract, is the fact that volatile organic compounds are mainly blood borne and the concentration of biologically relevant substances in exhaled breath closely reflects that in the arterial system. Therefore, breath is predestined for monitoring different processes in the body.…”

Optical Acetone Vapor Sensors Based on Chiral Nematic Liquid Crystals and Reactive Chiral Dopants

“…Another potential application for acetone sensors is monitoring blood-glucose levels in the case of type 1 diabetes by using breath acetone level as a proxy, [29,30] although significant debate remains over the validity of breath acetone as a suitable proxy. [31,32] If acetone is shown to be a reliable biomarker then acetone sensors have the potential for diagnostic and monitoring applications in diabetes management.…”

Quantification of ammonia in human breath by the selected ion flow tube analytical method using H3O+ and O2+ precursor ions

“…7 It is known that some of these trace gases are elevated above normal concentrations when the donor is suffering from certain clinical conditions; for example, acetone is elevated when the donor is diabetic.…”