2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ics.2007.01.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and specificity of magnetocardiography, using computerized classification of current density vectors maps, in ischemic patients with normal ECG and echocardiogram

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results seem to be very promising also in comparison with other MCG-based methods, which reached a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 85% in the best cases [14,[16][17][18][19]24,25]. The classification method that we propose has also a better performance than our previous classification system based on the MCG signal features extracted by ICA, for which we obtained a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 96% when using MCG data recorded at rest [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results seem to be very promising also in comparison with other MCG-based methods, which reached a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 85% in the best cases [14,[16][17][18][19]24,25]. The classification method that we propose has also a better performance than our previous classification system based on the MCG signal features extracted by ICA, for which we obtained a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 96% when using MCG data recorded at rest [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Another study on 123 patients assessed the discriminative power of CDV maps obtained from MCG recordings in ischemic patients with normal ECG at rest and normal left ventricular function. The MCG based computerized classification achieved a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 81% for CDV maps calculated during the ST-T interval [17]. Other MCG based methods were developed to differentiate CAD patients using the current distribution parameters during repolarization (sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 74.3%) [18] or the subtracted ST-T waveform (sensitivity of 74.6% and specificity of 84.1%) [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts of 3-D modeling and threedimensional imaging of cardiac electrophysiological activity based on current density images were made [9]. Fairly good results have been achieved in classification of current density vector maps, including classification, based on clusters analysis for coronary artery disease and ischemic heart disease detection [10], [11]. Nevertheless, classification of MCG data, especially CDDMs is on its early stage.…”
Section: One Of the Approaches Of Studying Magnetic Field In Humanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3-D modeling and three-dimensional imaging of cardiac electrophysiological activity based on current density images were performed [6]. Rather good results have been achieved in classification of current density vector maps, including classification, based on cluster analysis for coronary artery disease and ischemic heart disease detection [7][8]. Nevertheless, classification of MCG data, especially CDDMs is on its starting point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%