2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and resolution of two-dimensional NMR diffusion-relaxation measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak in the upper edge of the maps is an artifact of 2D‐ILT due to insufficient sampling of higher gradients. To confirm the location of the main peak in the 2D distribution, a single line of data was extracted in each dimension to produce a 1D spectrum of diffusion and relaxation as the 1D ILT is numerically more stable than the 2D (Kausik & Hurlimann, ). As expected, bulk water is characterized by D water = 2.4 × 10 −9 m 2 /s with a reasonably narrow distribution width and by an average T 2 of 2.6 s. Compared to free water, the presence of biofilm_1 produces a significant shift of a portion of the signal to smaller D and lower T 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak in the upper edge of the maps is an artifact of 2D‐ILT due to insufficient sampling of higher gradients. To confirm the location of the main peak in the 2D distribution, a single line of data was extracted in each dimension to produce a 1D spectrum of diffusion and relaxation as the 1D ILT is numerically more stable than the 2D (Kausik & Hurlimann, ). As expected, bulk water is characterized by D water = 2.4 × 10 −9 m 2 /s with a reasonably narrow distribution width and by an average T 2 of 2.6 s. Compared to free water, the presence of biofilm_1 produces a significant shift of a portion of the signal to smaller D and lower T 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, since the relaxation rates of fluids and solids are significantly different, and solid NMR signal is more clearly captured in high field, it is nearly impossible to acquire the whole range of effective signal by an identical device. In other words, low-field NMR technologies are very likely to set a "blind zone" for rock composition analysis (Mehana and Elmonier 2016;Kausik and Hürlimann 2016). Recently, several reports have discussed the method of high-field T 1 -T 2 maps for separating signals of solid components (Papaioannou and Kausik 2015; Song and Kausik 2019), but they are isolated from cores.…”
Section: Petrophysical Property Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, NMR logging while drilling (NMR-LWD) tools, which started appearing in the oil/gas industry in the early 2000s [ 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ], could determine and identify different fluid phases and their dynamics in geological formations in real-time, while drilling, thus saving time and reducing the cost in a drilling operation. NMR-LWD is rapidly becoming an important logging tool in the oil/gas industry [ 95 ] and more recent works on NMR [ 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 ] continue to drive advancements in NMR-LWD tools to provide more accurate and better characterization of geological formations [ 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 ].…”
Section: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (Nmr)mentioning
confidence: 99%