Sensitivity Analysis Using Simple Additive Weighting Method

Goodridge, Wayne

doi:10.5815/ijisa.2016.05.04

Cited by 25 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 20 publications

(20 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Weighting (S-SAW) (Goodridge, 2016). Due to its simplicity, this sensitivity analysis method has a vast potential to be applied to other MCDM methods as an extension of the sensitivity analysis investigation.…”

Section: Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods Have Been Usedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sensitivity Analysis Technique for Fuzzy TOPSIS using Improvised Sensitive-Simple Additive Weighting Method

2020

ASMSJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods Have Been Usedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sensitivity Analysis Technique for Fuzzy TOPSIS using Improvised Sensitive-Simple Additive Weighting Method

2020

ASMSJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The method involves a lot of decision-making criteria which usually described as Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method. According to Olson [7] and Goodridge performed a sensitivity analysis using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) MCDM method [8]. In his paper, the SAW method is extended to include an objective function which makes it easy to analyze the influence of specific changes in certain criteria values thus making easy to perform sensitivity analysis.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decision Support System Performance-Based Evaluation of Village Government using AHP and TOPSIS Methods: Secang Sub-district of Magelang Regency as a Case Study

Listyaningsih¹,

Utami²

2018

IJISA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increasing of village grants provider growth opportunities for villages every year. The Reliable performance of village governance is the main factor that determines the development of a village. In Secang, there are still many rural governance performances that are not optimal yet, therefore we need a system of performance evaluation of the village government. Decision support systems with a combination of AHP and TOPSIS models can be used to help evaluating performance village Government. AHP method is used to perform the weighting of the criteria and TOPSIS methods to make a ranking system of the performance evaluation of village government. AHP was chosen because it has many advantages of computation weighting while TOPSIS was efficient and able to measure the relative performance in a simple mathematical form. One advantage of the system that was built is the dynamic nature of the assessment criteria used for the calculation process, with menus for assessment criteria period the user can add or reduce the assessment criteria in accordance with the requirements or regulations. Output of DSS Village Government Performance Evaluation is village government performance ratings that can be used as a consideration in determining rewards and assistance to the village from the sub-district. From the test results on ranking and prototype, 86.67% of users agree that the prototype can be implemented and used to evaluate the performance of village government in the Secang sub-district.

show abstract

“…Weighing becomes an important issue to yield ranking such as the issue of weight update [6], new Entropy weight [7], Sensitivity-Simple Additive Weighting (S-SAW) [8], mutual weight [9]- [11].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Decision Model for Selection of Tourism Site Using Analytic Network Process Method

Hadiwijaya¹,

Hamdani²,

Syafrianto³

et al. 2018

IJISA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The criteria and sub criteria-based decision model for selection of tourism site using Analytic Network Process (ANP) method was to be implemented in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. In this study, we proposed criteria and sub criteria that influenced each other and had feedback between the two so that there was a comparison of tourism site alternatives according to sub criteria and pairwise comparative assessment with scale 1-9 that was then calculated in form of matrix of pairwise comparison. The result of this study was in form of decision alternatives in form of ranking to facilitate decision makers (DMs) in finding tourism sites.

show abstract

Sensitivity Analysis Using Simple Additive Weighting Method

Cited by 25 publications

References 20 publications

Sensitivity Analysis Technique for Fuzzy TOPSIS using Improvised Sensitive-Simple Additive Weighting Method

Sensitivity Analysis Technique for Fuzzy TOPSIS using Improvised Sensitive-Simple Additive Weighting Method

Decision Support System Performance-Based Evaluation of Village Government using AHP and TOPSIS Methods: Secang Sub-district of Magelang Regency as a Case Study

The Decision Model for Selection of Tourism Site Using Analytic Network Process Method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About