2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis of WRF model PBL schemes in simulating boundary-layer variables in southern Italy: An experimental campaign

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
30
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The general overestimation of the WRF modelled wind speed found in the current study is in agreement with other studies performed using this mesoscalar model over different regions (see e. g. Borge et al, 2008;Draxl et al, 2014;Hariprasad et al, 2014;Santos-Alamillos et al, 2015;Kalverla et al, 2016;Avolio et al, 2017). A plausible reason for this wind speed overestimation could be a lack of frictional drag near the surface (Kalverla et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The general overestimation of the WRF modelled wind speed found in the current study is in agreement with other studies performed using this mesoscalar model over different regions (see e. g. Borge et al, 2008;Draxl et al, 2014;Hariprasad et al, 2014;Santos-Alamillos et al, 2015;Kalverla et al, 2016;Avolio et al, 2017). A plausible reason for this wind speed overestimation could be a lack of frictional drag near the surface (Kalverla et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Hu et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2013), and also in Europe (see e.g. Avolio et al, 2017) or tropical areas (Xie et al, 2012). Although just highlighting here the differences in the temperature field trends, the contrast of both models is also found in other sensible surface weather parameters, such as the surface heat fluxes or the moisture field (Tolk et al, 2009;Steeneveld et al, 2011), as well as considering the wind field or the downwelling shortwave radiation (Avolio et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, the weather conditions for the P2 period showed typically clear weather that continued for a week, which were suitable for an improved simulation performance of the WRF model. In previous studies verifying WRF simulations performed in China, Spain, and India, the correlation coefficients for air temperature and wind speed ranged between 0.78–0.94 and 0.20–0.53, respectively [ 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ]. Their similar values to the results of this study demonstrate that the meteorological inputs provided from the WRF model to the CFD model are appropriate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%