2011
DOI: 10.5242/iamg.2011.0172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis of spatial models using geostatistical simulation

Abstract: Geostatistical simulations are used to perform a global sensitivity analysis on a model Y = f(X 1 ... X k ) where one of the model inputs X i is a continuous 2D-field. Geostatistics allow specifying uncertainty on X i with a spatial covariance model and generating random realizations of X i . These random realizations are used to propagate uncertainty through model f and estimate global sensitivity indices. Focusing on variance-based global sensitivity analysis (GSA), we assess in this paper how sensitivity in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Global Spatial Sensitivity Analysis (GSSA) [27,30] relies on Sobol methods [48], which can deal with non-linear and non-monotonic relationships between inputs and output [49][50][51][52]. These methods are based on the functional decomposition of variance (ANOVA) of the model prediction (Y) into partial variances caused due to each model input (X) (either considered singularly or in combination), i.e.,…”
Section: Global Spatial Sensitivity Analysis: Sobol Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Global Spatial Sensitivity Analysis (GSSA) [27,30] relies on Sobol methods [48], which can deal with non-linear and non-monotonic relationships between inputs and output [49][50][51][52]. These methods are based on the functional decomposition of variance (ANOVA) of the model prediction (Y) into partial variances caused due to each model input (X) (either considered singularly or in combination), i.e.,…”
Section: Global Spatial Sensitivity Analysis: Sobol Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variables are then upscaled to various supports (1.6 km, 3.2 km, 6.4 km, and 12.8 km), using two different averaging methodologies, to study the influence of upscaling methods on an RTM performance. Adopting the global spatial sensitivity analysis (GSSA) [27][28][29][30], the sensitivity to soil and vegetation characteristics across scales are evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample points play an important role in ensuring the accuracy of the surrogate model. When selecting the sample points, we should cover the entire design range as randomly and As a nonoverlapping, spatial, random, and stratified sampling method, Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) [18] divides the design space equally into many uniform probability intervals, conducts sampling in each interval, and then randomly arranges the sampling data of all intervals. The sampling calculation is performed using the following formula:…”
Section: Principle and Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, a single-/multiobjective optimization method (termed as RBF-OLHS-NGA/NSGA II method) was constructed for optimizing the design of a leadbismuth reactor core, which involved the RBF surrogate model, orthogonal Latin hypercube sampling (OLHS) [18], and niche/nondominated sorting genetic (NGA/NSGA II) algorithm [19,20]. A design optimization procedure of the lead-bismuth reactor (DOPPLER-R) based on this method was developed, which coupled the reactor Monte Carlo (RMC) [21] code and the steady-state thermal-hydraulic analysis code (STAC) [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, however, all fine‐scale information is lost, thus impeding any analysis of the drivers acting across different scales. An alternative solution is represented by meta‐models, which offer the possibility of reducing model output complexity by establishing a simplified mathematical relationship between the input and output of the system (Simpson et al 2001, Ratto et al 2012, Saint‐Geours 2012, Jia and Taflanidis 2013). Where possible, an elegant way to build meta‐models is the approximation through an analytical model, which is fitted to the large‐scale output and allows for simplification (Grimm and Railsback 2005, Johst 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%