1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4347(96)00202-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitive determination of nitrotyrosine in human plasma by isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
54
1
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
54
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, Frost et al 4 have measured by GC/MS a NO 2 Tyr concentration of 64 nmol/L and a mean 3-nitrotyrosine:tyrosine ratio of Ϸ35ϫ1:10 6 in plasma of healthy humans. These values are 23 and 35 times higher than those measured by us, 9,10 respectively, and even 2 times higher than those found by Kamisaki et al 5 Immunohistochemical methods and ELISA 7,8 are frequently used to detect 3-nitrotyrosine. However, the highly divergent values reported for plasma 3-nitrotyrosine ranging between not detectable 7 and 120 nmol/L, 8 strongly suggest that these semiquantitative methods are suffering from serious methodological problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, Frost et al 4 have measured by GC/MS a NO 2 Tyr concentration of 64 nmol/L and a mean 3-nitrotyrosine:tyrosine ratio of Ϸ35ϫ1:10 6 in plasma of healthy humans. These values are 23 and 35 times higher than those measured by us, 9,10 respectively, and even 2 times higher than those found by Kamisaki et al 5 Immunohistochemical methods and ELISA 7,8 are frequently used to detect 3-nitrotyrosine. However, the highly divergent values reported for plasma 3-nitrotyrosine ranging between not detectable 7 and 120 nmol/L, 8 strongly suggest that these semiquantitative methods are suffering from serious methodological problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…4 The discussion on this subject is incomplete and leaves out other serious problems and solutions. We would like to discuss critically these issues and to evaluate the most relevant techniques 3-10 that are presently available to determine levels of NO 2 Tyr and NO 2 TyrProt, which include MS-based methods, ie LC/MS/MS, 3 GC/MS, 4 and GC/MS/MS, 9,10 HPLC, 5,6 and ELISA. 7,8 Acidification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dried extract was dissolved in 100 l ethanol:H 2 O (70:30) by rapid vortexing and then centrifuged at 12,000 ϫ g for 10 minutes. The supernatant was frozen at Ϫ20°C until derivatization and quantitation by HPLC, as previously described (Kamisaki et al, 1996). Derivatization of nitrotyrosine was performed by adding 10 l sodium borate, 0.1 M, pH 8.7 and 10 l 4-fluoro-7-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (10 mg/ml in ethanol) to 50 l of the ethanol:H 2 O solution containing islet extract and incubating at 60°C for 2 minutes.…”
Section: Nitrotyrosine Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissue homogenenates were prepared according to the method described by Kamisaki et al [15]. Briefly, 0.5 g heart tissue was homogenized in 1.5 ml of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH: 7.2) and then centrifuged for 5 min at 600 g. Following the acid hydrolysation of the precipitate, it was evaporated under nitrogen.…”
Section: Measurement Of Tyrosine Nitrationmentioning
confidence: 99%