2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitive and less invasive confirmatory diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in Sudan using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)

Abstract: BackgroundConfirmatory diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL), as well as diagnosis of relapses and test of cure, usually requires examination by microscopy of samples collected by invasive means, such as splenic, bone marrow or lymph node aspirates. This causes discomfort to patients, with risks of bleeding and iatrogenic infections, and requires technical expertise. Molecular tests have great potential for diagnosis of VL using peripheral blood, but require well-equipped facilities and trained personnel. M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as also reported by other authors, it is important to point out that information provided by molecular analysis should not be separated from the data obtained from clinical signs and serological evaluations, because a positive PCR indicates a Leishmania infection, but not necessarily the disease development [5]. In fact, comparisons performed for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniosis (VL) in humans between a commercial LAMP kit (EikenChemical Co., Tokyo, Japan) and other molecular and/or serological techniques, showed that LAMP could be included in the algorithm for VL, and could be used to support other laboratory findings [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, as also reported by other authors, it is important to point out that information provided by molecular analysis should not be separated from the data obtained from clinical signs and serological evaluations, because a positive PCR indicates a Leishmania infection, but not necessarily the disease development [5]. In fact, comparisons performed for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniosis (VL) in humans between a commercial LAMP kit (EikenChemical Co., Tokyo, Japan) and other molecular and/or serological techniques, showed that LAMP could be included in the algorithm for VL, and could be used to support other laboratory findings [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors showed that LAMP is easy-to-use, highly sensitive (90-98%) and specific (80-100%) and allows to perform in-situ analysis, but no standardized protocols are available in the veterinary field. Contrariwise, to detect human leishmaniosis, the Loopamp™ Leishmania kit has been developed by the Eiken Chemical Co. (Tokyo, Japan) and successfully validated [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rK28 RDT presented higher sensitivity and specificity (98.81% and 100 % respectively) than DAT. The LAMP kit had high specificity regardless of the type of DNA extraction method used or sample analysed, (whole blood or buffy coat), avoiding the need for invasive lymph node aspiration [96]. Ibarra-Meneses et al, 2018, demonstrated that by combining this kit with a portable and robust real-time fluorimetry, a versatile assay able to diagnose VL in situations in which the serological diagnosis is useless such as in VL relapses and testof-cure, or VL / HIV co-infection and even in canine leishmaniasis was possible [97].…”
Section: Lamp Assays For Diagnosis Of Leishma-niasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SE method has not, however, been evaluated using skin samples. Alternatively, we found a relatively simple DNA extraction method based on an inhouse lysis buffer to be suitable for Loop-mediated isothermal assays (27,28). In an effort to develop a field-friendly diagnostic algorithm for detecting L. donovani DNA in skin samples from PKDL patients we therefore assessed various nucleic acid extraction techniques in combination with an RPA assay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%