2016
DOI: 10.25110/arqvet.v19i2.2016.5926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensibilidade Parasitológica De Diferentes Locais De Colheita Para O Diagnóstico De Leishmaniose Em Cães

Abstract: LIMA, M. A. M. de; MAIA, J. S. Sensibilidade parasitológica de diferentes locais de colheita para o diagnósti-co de leishmaniose em cães. Arq. Ciênc. Vet. Zool. UNIPAR, Umuarama, v. 19, n. 2, p. 91-93, abr./jun. 2016. RESUMO:A leishmaniose é uma zoonose de grande importância para a saúde pública. São grandes os estudos para que se conheçam diferentes técnicas para diagnóstico e que estes testes tenham alta sensibilidade. Este estudo teve como objetivo comparar a sensibilidade do teste parasitológico frente a d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positivity of animals observed here was higher than those obtained in epidemiological surveys carried out in other states, such as Bahia (Rodrigues et al 2020 ), Mato Grosso (Carvalho et al 2020 ), Minas Gerais (Castro-Júnior et al 2014 ), and São Paulo (Julião et al 2007 ). These results may be related to the diversity of biological samples and laboratory tests used in our study, which may allow an increase in the rates of sensitivity for the LC diagnosis (Sassaki et al 2011 ; Braz et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The positivity of animals observed here was higher than those obtained in epidemiological surveys carried out in other states, such as Bahia (Rodrigues et al 2020 ), Mato Grosso (Carvalho et al 2020 ), Minas Gerais (Castro-Júnior et al 2014 ), and São Paulo (Julião et al 2007 ). These results may be related to the diversity of biological samples and laboratory tests used in our study, which may allow an increase in the rates of sensitivity for the LC diagnosis (Sassaki et al 2011 ; Braz et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%