2006
DOI: 10.1080/10510970600667030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensemaking and Emotions in Organizations: Accounting for Emotions in a Rational(ized) Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Three forms of validity checking were used for the current study's findings (two forms are recommended by Creswell 2007). First, a member checking technique was used (e.g., Dougherty and Drumheller 2006). The author and a graduate student who participated in data collection re-contacted participants, asking them to play a role in this phase.…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three forms of validity checking were used for the current study's findings (two forms are recommended by Creswell 2007). First, a member checking technique was used (e.g., Dougherty and Drumheller 2006). The author and a graduate student who participated in data collection re-contacted participants, asking them to play a role in this phase.…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the author engaged in in-depth member checking. This method (sharing results with participants and asking for feedback on how the results do or do not reflect the participants' perceptions) is an accepted source of validity checking in phenomenological work (Bronfenbrenner 1976) and is frequently used in qualitative studies (e.g., Bergen et al 2007;Dougherty and Drumheller 2006;Toller 2008). Member checking can range from presenting findings to one or two participants (Dougherty 2001), to a percentage (Toller 2008), to each participant.…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the rational bias in organizations (Dougherty & Drumheller, 2006) and the findings of Kipnis et al (1980) that those who sought to initiate change would use more rational tactics, it is Downloaded by [University of Windsor] at 06:06 18 November 2014 likely that solution presentations and direct-factual appeals would also be commonly associated with goals trying to change someone's opinion or behavior. Additionally, Falbe and Yukl (1992) argued that inspirational appeals were among the more successful messages in changing the audience's opinion on a topic.…”
Section: Rq: What Goals Most Frequently Shape Dissent Interactions?mentioning
confidence: 99%